DaBears23
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 14, 2014
- Posts:
- 364
- Liked Posts:
- 51
Im not sure how the cap situation works but i was wondering hypothetically if we signed Suh then would we have money left to sign any other guys that can potentially start for us?
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 56,470
- Liked Posts:
- 61,924
no.
DaBears23
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 14, 2014
- Posts:
- 364
- Liked Posts:
- 51
thanks bruh
ZenBear34
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 28, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,379
- Liked Posts:
- 3,799
yes.
Mitchapalooza
Guest
thanks bruh
- Joined:
- Sep 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 6,572
- Liked Posts:
- 5,847
- Location:
- Semi-Nomadic
My favorite teams
Hypothetically, yes, we have plenty of cap room and can sign him to a big contract, and with all the holes on defense we could hire some castoffs who can hold their spot down for a year.
Realistically, we arent going to win the bidding war for him. Suh has made it clear that he is looking to sign the largest contract offered. Fox and Fangio likely came in with a list of pending free agents from their old teams that they would like to bring to Chicago. Honestly I'd rather try to sign McCourty, who will command a smaller salary, and let Suh go elsewhere
Realistically, we arent going to win the bidding war for him. Suh has made it clear that he is looking to sign the largest contract offered. Fox and Fangio likely came in with a list of pending free agents from their old teams that they would like to bring to Chicago. Honestly I'd rather try to sign McCourty, who will command a smaller salary, and let Suh go elsewhere
