- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 14,989
- Liked Posts:
- 14,787
I had to google the connection, and as a result added "Stalker" to my list.I love Tarkovsky. Just gonna put that out there.
I had to google the connection, and as a result added "Stalker" to my list.I love Tarkovsky. Just gonna put that out there.
Solaris was my first love. Mirror is so good too. Stalker is good, but hmmm. It's good. I wanna say the most straight forward? You'll also see how much all sci Fi sucks. Like I watched Moon and was like yeah yeah yeah seen and done.I had to google the connection, and as a result added "Stalker" to my list.
I had to google the connection, and as a result added "Stalker" to my list.
Also as soon as you watch it I want a report!I had to google the connection, and as a result added "Stalker" to my list.
Great post, know exactly what you mean. I remember feeling that same boredom with Deer Hunter. Sometimes I can stomach it, sometimes I can't. Deer Hunter is one where I can't; it's a decent movie, but it isn't one of my favorites. The Godfathers have always been easier for me; even Saints of Newark I enjoyed. I've never seen the Irishman, but I've heard it's utterly atrocious.We had a film study elective class in high school.
The teacher said something that has always stuck with me.
"You can watch a classic, get the point entirely, appreciate what is being said, yet still not be impressed. It doesnt mean you missed anything. It doesnt mean you dont appreciate the medium. It is all a result of personal preference, and if you dont like the presentation that is just fine".
I for one am not a fan of slow moving, slow dialogue movies with lingering framing shots and dim lighting to set moods. It feels like overkill and puts me to sleep.
I will admit without hesitation that i absolutely went out of my head with boredom at the Godfather franchise.
weirdly enough I liked the presentation of "blade runner" even though it relied heavily on that, but despised the new blade runner for relying on it.
Movie enjoyment is hit or miss for me.
I finally saw The Batman and I agree, I liked it overall. I'm not into superhero movies normally, but this one was enjoyable. It was ambitious in that they were trying to mix Batman with Seven with some Taxi Driver, etc. I also liked how a few scenes were callbacks to scenes from other Batmans -- this was started by other directors, and it's like a weird tradition. Like the Bar scene where Batman goes to see the Penguin for the first time; and when Bruce is seeing Alfred, I couldn't help but think of the scene in the Joker when Fleck sees his mother in the hospital -- they both say "you lied" (or something to that effect). There were other scenes that were more obvious callbacks but I can't remember them now.I enjoyed it.
I hated emo bruce wayne, but thankfully that was kept to a minimum.
No spoilers, nothing about the plot itself in this comment...
They did something unique that I really enjoyed in this version- they came up with a logical way for batman to move around the city without attracting attention.
Several times he had to get from here to there and instead of a big gaudy batmobile, He jumped on a bike in plain clothes.
He was in the batsuit, had to get to the batsignal or whatnot, and he threw on a regular coat and helmet and ripped through the streets on the bike only to get there and change back.
I always had an issue overlooking the batmobile flying all over the city in traffic.
there are some blocakages or congestion that you absolutely could not get past, even on the sidewalk.
Since he didnt have a flying option, I appreciated a realistic means of transportation.
I finally saw The Batman and I agree, I liked it overall. I'm not into superhero movies normally, but this one was enjoyable. It was ambitious in that they were trying to mix Batman with Seven with some Taxi Driver, etc. I also liked how a few scenes were callbacks to scenes from other Batmans -- this was started by other directors, and it's like a weird tradition. Like the Bar scene where Batman goes to see the Penguin for the first time; and when Bruce is seeing Alfred, I couldn't help but think of the scene in the Joker when Fleck sees his mother in the hospital -- they both say "you lied" (or something to that effect). There were other scenes that were more obvious callbacks but I can't remember them now.
But what I really liked about it was how they made it more realistic, like you said -- not just with Batman, but with everything. The aesthetics, maybe not so much with the batsuit, but with Catwoman's suit and especially the Riddler's; that's really clothing anyone can get their hands on, which was cool. And the vehicles were just motorcycles; the batmobile was a bit exaggerated like usual, but compared to other batmobiles, it was definitely the most realistic looking one -- it wasn't some military-grade fucking tank rolling down the street, for example. And the Riddler using the dark web and social media was also a nice touch.
The casting was also spectacular. Dano, Pattinson, Kravitz -- just great and really did a solid job, in my view. Commissioner Gordon (forget his real name) and Ferrell were also good.
But yes, it's way too long. Really, no movie should be close to 3 hours long.
Right there with you with Deer Hunter.Great post, know exactly what you mean. I remember feeling that same boredom with Deer Hunter. Sometimes I can stomach it, sometimes I can't. Deer Hunter is one where I can't; it's a decent movie, but it isn't one of my favorites. The Godfathers have always been easier for me; even Saints of Newark I enjoyed. I've never seen the Irishman, but I've heard it's utterly atrocious.
Anything with Morgan freeman gets a one star upgrade on him alone.The Shawshank Redemption
A+
️️️️️
??
I never read the book but seeing the movie after doing a ghost investigation at the prison in Ohio made the movie very interesting. And I agree with your assessment of Freeman. He was the narrator on some science shows I used to watch. He made them more interesting.Anything with Morgan freeman gets a one star upgrade on him alone.
He killed it in that movie.
Steven King has had a lot of shitty movies made from great books, and often the character portrayals suck ass.
Freeman in that movie and the creepy fat **** who played Will Darnell in Christine were fucking awesome though.
Reading the books I can only picture the actors now.
I wasn't quite that young when I watched it. I think I was like 8, maybe. I distinctly remember the first time watching it, as a kid, I was seriously going out of my mind with boredom for like the first hour of that movie -- the wedding scene, the hunting scene, etc.I liked deerhunter. My dad was a veteran and I remember watching it at like 4 years old
Oh man, same thing happened to me with regarding to the book/movie with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest and American Psycho. Once you see the movie, the book is essentially ruined, as half the fun of reading is imagining the characters and the surroundings yourself.Anything with Morgan freeman gets a one star upgrade on him alone.
He killed it in that movie.
Steven King has had a lot of shitty movies made from great books, and often the character portrayals suck ass.
Freeman in that movie and the creepy fat **** who played Will Darnell in Christine were fucking awesome though.
Reading the books I can only picture the actors now.
I was on a jury a few years back, and the only reason the forman was selected was because he looked exactly like Morgan Freeman. The judge even commented on it when we were all done.4 years ago, Morgan Freeman came into a blues club I was playing at in Memphis..He is a huge lover of the blues. He complimented us. Great night!