REACTION: Kings shut out Blackhawks 2-0

[HawkWriter]

He pushed him a little and after Toews fell to the ice, Richards fell. Not really a tackle...

Haha, common now...really? Toews fell...? If the script was flipped we would be hearing a different story. If that isn't a penalty shot, then I don't know what is.

 

[Capt. Serious]

Nice fun stat on Crow.

That penalty on Scott in the first was bullshit and really wrecked what the team had going, unfortunately. Refs had a brutal night overall.

Uh no it wasn't. Scott throwing a few punches behind the refs was his own fault.

 

[TheChicagoFan]

Haha, common now...really? Toews fell...? If the script was flipped we would be hearing a different story. If that isn't a penalty shot, then I don't know what is.

Toews dove and pushed Richards a little, hit the ice. After hitting the ice, Richards hit it too.

Yeah, I might be mad if it was flipped and Toews didn't get the shot, but of course I would be. Even if it was the right call to not give a shot, I would be mad.

I just thought it was a little weak of a call.

As far as the Scott penalty, yeah Scott did do something wrong, but wasn't the only one. A Kings player hit him first after the whistle and Scott responded. I had no problem with him getting a penalty, but shouldn't have been only one.

 

[HawkWriter]

Toews dove and pushed Richards a little, hit the ice. After hitting the ice, Richards hit it too.

Yeah, I might be mad if it was flipped and Toews didn't get the shot, but of course I would be. Even if it was the right call to not give a shot, I would be mad.

I just thought it was a little weak of a call.

As far as the Scott penalty, yeah Scott did do something wrong, but wasn't the only one. A Kings player hit him first after the whistle and Scott responded. I had no problem with him getting a penalty, but shouldn't have been only one.

I'm not even going to argue it further because you are looking at it with a whole lot of bias from by your own admission basically.

Once again, the issue with the Scott penalty is that someone shoves him in the chest first around the net and he knocks someone in the head second. Everyone should know by now who gets called in that series. It's what always happens.

 

[TheChicagoFan]

I'm not even going to argue it further because you are looking at it with a whole lot of bias from by your own admission basically.

Once again, the issue with the Scott penalty is that someone shoves him in the chest first around the net and he knocks someone in the head second. Everyone should know by now who gets called in that series. It's what always happens.

I'm not an analyst. I'm a fan. Of course I'm bias.

I know that Scott will always get called for it, but that doesn't mean it's right.