RoseMVP1
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 25, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,965
- Liked Posts:
- 973
It's only worth it if the Celtics give up young guys and both Brooklyn picks.
James. Cle
Durant. Gs
Curry. Gs
Westbrook. Okc
Leonard. Sa
Harden. Hou
Paul. Lac
Lillard. Por
Davis. No
Aldridge. Sa
Griffin. Lac
Wall. Was
Irving. Cle
Cousins. Sac
George. In
DeRozan. Tor
Lowry. Tor
Thompson. Gs
Butler. Chi
Antetokounmpo. Mil
19th or 20th best for sure
I would say for this season, he's above the bolded guys. And guys like Demar, Lowry, Irving, and Wall are debatable. He's definitely better than 19th in the league. I think you can rate him comfortably between 10-15.
Lol Paul George...one of the most overrated players in recent memory. And you're basing Aldridge over Jimmy over a couple of playoff games? And how is Griffin the better scorer again? I don't know man...we definitely don't see eye to eye on this one.
Lol Paul George...one of the most overrated players in recent memory. And you're basing Aldridge over Jimmy over a couple of playoff games? And how is Griffin the better scorer again? I don't know man...we definitely don't see eye to eye on this one.
Not saying this is my argument, but to entertain the point....
So what if you trade Butler for a pick that winds up being a top 20 player in the future? The Bulls aren't winning now, so a top 10 player now on a .500 team is basically just to sell a few tickets. The Bulls aren't structured for a quick rebuild, well, they could be on paper, but that is not how Gar/Pax have demonstrated their war room prowess. So maybe a top 20 player in 4-5 years is worth more than a top 10 for the next few years. Yes, the team runs the risk of being in a Philly-esque spiral of being ripe for break-out, but never get the matching parts or expected player development to do so.