Roquan Smith fastest to 1,000 tackles

DanielCCSBears

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 7, 2022
Posts:
5,529
Liked Posts:
1,756
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
1000002250.jpg

What will the Bears PR team make you believe this year?

Some of their recent greatest hits:

Chase Claypool is set to have his best year ever...

Darnell Wright did the WR conditioning test....

Gervon Dexter did the DE conditioning test....

Matt Eberflus is a better coach because of a beard haircut and new clothes....

Jaylon Johnson doesn't deserve an early contract extension because he doesn't have enough picks....

Roschon Johnson cleans up after his teammates in the running back meeting room.

This is the best offensive line depth ever....

Right now Todd Monken is the next Bruce Arians is the latest one brewing.
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,858
Liked Posts:
12,915
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
The mistake was signing Edmunds. Roquan is a very good player but why spend $18m/year when you have tons of cheap off ball LBs who are very close to as good. Two of the all pros this year are making less than $7.5m.
 

jsu34

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
3,695
Liked Posts:
2,999
Location:
City Of Big Shoulders
Yall are all insane. This is a tell that this team is bad. Paying based on position instead of the player.

No possible way to justify not paying Roquan then paying Edmunds as much as they did.

I've heard it all:

1. Don't pay for RB but I would if it were Saquon or Henry.

2. Dont pay for off ball LB but I would for Smith.

There's this slam on the McCaskeys for being cheap but then defending this foolishness. Good players cost money.

You'd have a point if Roquan fell off after leaving here but he's still playing at a high level.

Congrats. We've reached NY Giant level stupid with this.
 

MakeMyDay

VISIONARY
Donator
Joined:
Aug 25, 2012
Posts:
2,387
Liked Posts:
1,752
You think he regrets not having an NFLPA agent and having spiritual advisor Saint Ommy negotiate his deal??? ROTFLMAO
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
9,884
Liked Posts:
7,629
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
Yall are all insane. This is a tell that this team is bad. Paying based on position instead of the player.

No possible way to justify not paying Roquan then paying Edmunds as much as they did.

I've heard it all:

1. Don't pay for RB but I would if it were Saquon or Henry.

2. Dont pay for off ball LB but I would for Smith.

There's this slam on the McCaskeys for being cheap but then defending this foolishness. Good players cost money.

You'd have a point if Roquan fell off after leaving here but he's still playing at a high level.

Congrats. We've reached NY Giant level stupid with this.
Why would you pay Henry or Barkley top money when the line can’t block?

Letting Smith walk was the right move. Signing Edwards to a similar contract was the mistake the Bears made.
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
9,884
Liked Posts:
7,629
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
1) they didn't let him walk

2) you don't let blue chip talent walk out the building

3) they didn't get nearly enough back in trade for him.
1) Is Smith still a member of the Bears?

2) Yet they did


So to reiterate, the Bears let Smith walk.
 
Last edited:

jsu34

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
3,695
Liked Posts:
2,999
Location:
City Of Big Shoulders
Why would you pay Henry or Barkley top money when the line can’t block?

Letting Smith walk was the right move. Signing Edwards to a similar contract was the mistake the Bears made.
Henry and Barkley were never going to be bears but it wasn't smart of their teams to let them leave, especially in the case of the Giants.

This is the bears. You had to know they would do this and fail to capitalize on any savings from Smith leaving.

You keep Smith. And pay him.

Giants should've kept and paid Saquon.

Otherwise no one here should be criticizing the bears for signing Edmunds or Edmunds for his poor play. This is what you get.
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
9,884
Liked Posts:
7,629
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
Henry and Barkley were never going to be bears but it wasn't smart of their teams to let them leave, especially in the case of the Giants.

This is the bears. You had to know they would do this and fail to capitalize on any savings from Smith leaving.

You keep Smith. And pay him.

Giants should've kept and paid Saquon.

Otherwise no one here should be criticizing the bears for signing Edmunds or Edmunds for his poor play. This is what you get.
Why wasn’t it smart? They are terrible teams. Barkley and Henry don’t all of a sudden make those two teams playoff teams.

Smith had beef with the organization and clearly didn’t want to be here. So if that’s the case, it’s time to move on.

Everyone criticized the amount of money the Bears gave Edmunds. It was stupid.
 

TheEarlofRobin

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 23, 2024
Posts:
1,679
Liked Posts:
776
I don't know if the claim is accurate. And being youngest to 1000 tackles doesn't necessarily mean you were the fastest player to reach 1000 tackles. But still a nice achievement. Bears and Roquan kind of had a break up of sorts.
 

JayQ

New member
Joined:
Nov 6, 2012
Posts:
102
Liked Posts:
24
Most of those tackles with the Bears was because our offense was always 3 and out. He spent a lot of time on the field.
 

napo55

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 24, 2016
Posts:
2,303
Liked Posts:
1,541
Team Leaders. Good teams have them. Roquan, besides being an outstanding player was a key team leader. Poles doesn't understand this. Same for David Montgomery, a good short yardage RB, but a great team leader.

Yes, leadership does count!
 

PeppersSweater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 25, 2012
Posts:
666
Liked Posts:
298
Location:
Seattle, WA
I think the Roquan trade was fair.

Hated how much we paid Edmunds.

Loved the Edwards signing.
 

Noonthirtyjoe

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 22, 2013
Posts:
8,145
Liked Posts:
4,292
Yall are all insane. This is a tell that this team is bad. Paying based on position instead of the player.

No possible way to justify not paying Roquan then paying Edmunds as much as they did.

I've heard it all:

1. Don't pay for RB but I would if it were Saquon or Henry.

2. Dont pay for off ball LB but I would for Smith.

There's this slam on the McCaskeys for being cheap but then defending this foolishness. Good players cost money.

You'd have a point if Roquan fell off after leaving here but he's still playing at a high level.

Congrats. We've reached NY Giant level stupid with this.
McCaskey's are not cheap lolol. The cap is why we did not spend that money. I'm glad we didn't. He was a headache and the money was better spent elsewhere.
 

Top