houheffna
Ignoring Idiots
- Joined:
- May 6, 2009
- Posts:
- 8,673
- Liked Posts:
- 2,711
Derrick is "brutally honest"? Lol...I think the Bulls are ready to move on
There is absolutely nothing wrong with what Derrick said. EVERY SINGLE PLAYER thinks about free agency. All of Summer League & all of Team USA's practices were dominated by the talk, highlighted by John Wall mocking Reggie Jackson's contract. All the players are thinking about the salary cap TRIPLING in a few years. It is a bit odd offering it up like that but he was speaking in generalities about his off season and he was honest. I personally don't think he should have said anything but I'm not going to sit here and crucify him for it, or question his commitment to winning, or the team. Love it or hate it but he's always going to be brutally honest, even if it's at the most inopportune times.
Derrick is "brutally honest"? Lol...I think the Bulls are ready to move on
I think everyone has been ready to move on for yearsDerrick is "brutally honest"? Lol...I think the Bulls are ready to move on
There is absolutely nothing wrong with what Derrick said. EVERY SINGLE PLAYER thinks about free agency.
I wanted to tank that year
I think everyone has been ready to move on for years
Now that there is a good chance he returns to health, I am not ready to move on at all.
Let's not forget that Derrick Rose at his best represents the best hope to win a championship. He's a superstar.
Well it's not like such a thing is uncommon at his age. You don't really see guys taking pay cuts to win until they hit their mid 30s. It's not like Rose is gonna sign for the MLE. I still think Rose wants to win. I'd be surprised to see one of those get paid then fall off a cliff type of performance from him a la Larry Hughes.I think his attitude and his entourage are inhibiting hopes of his winning a title. He seems more concerned with money than winning.
Well it's not like such a thing is uncommon at his age. You don't really see guys taking pay cuts to win until they hit their mid 30s. It's not like Rose is gonna sign for the MLE. I still think Rose wants to win. I'd be surprised to see one of those get paid then fall off a cliff type of performance from him a la Larry Hughes.
That's true, but I think we can agree that such behavior is not the norm. All 3 made near max money anyway. I also thought that it was the premeditated decision to team up that got people riled up more so than the pay cuts they took, but perhaps that's just me.You saw 3 legit stars take a pay cut in Miami and people on this forum lambasted them for it. How long was it before Lebron got a max deal?
I can't argue with you there. I have no idea why he brought up 2017. I don't even know what he was asked initially. At the very least, from the way it was presented to us, it makes it seem quite out of place. Perhaps that's intentional or perhaps Rose is just being an idiot with the media, or some combination of both. If a player were to talk about free agency 2 years before the fact, it'd probably be something like "I'm not focused on that" or "This is where I want to be" or anything like that, most likely not talking about how much money they'd make, so that's all on Rose regardless of context.Rose isn't going to sign for the MLE, but he isn't a max player at this time. It is uncommon for players to talk about free agency 2 years before actual free agency. What he did is unusual to say the least...because it was unsolicited. Nobody asked him about 2017.
That's true, but I think we can agree that such behavior is not the norm. All 3 made near max money anyway. I also thought that it was the premeditated decision to team up that got people riled up more so than the pay cuts they took, but perhaps that's just me.
I can't argue with you there. I have no idea why he brought up 2017. I don't even know what he was asked initially. At the very least, from the way it was presented to us, it makes it seem quite out of place. Perhaps that's intentional or perhaps Rose is just being an idiot with the media, or some combination of both. If a player were to talk about free agency 2 years before the fact, it'd probably be something like "I'm not focused on that" or "This is where I want to be" or anything like that, most likely not talking about how much money they'd make, so that's all on Rose regardless of context.
Just another PR hit for a guy who's quickly becoming one of the most disliked players...at least among internet NBA fans.
Honestly, I think people were riled up because those three players (especially Lebron) wasn't playing for their team. As far as the Bulls go, it was written in stone supposedly that Joe Johnson was coming to Chicago. He didn't because he received a max deal from Atlanta (I remember getting into an argument with a certain poster on here who thought Johnson should have signed her anyway...he would have made the balance of the money on endorsements...but I digress). Those things happen also...all the time. Yet the Heat caught flack about it.
As far as the whole Rose-Butler feud...I still don't buy it. I see where the argument is coming from but I don't buy it. At least if there is, they've both denied it as they should. So props to Rose to not being an idiot there. The team also backed up that claim. So even if there is a feud, everyone's at least trying to keep it under wraps and away from the spotlight. I don't think we'll see a Shaq-Kobe situation.I really think that was a veiled shot at Butler...I really do. And Butler's response affirmed my belief even more.
“I don’t care what the guy talks about as long as he’s helping us win games,” said Butler, who signed a $92.3 million deal this offseason. “Whatever he’s focused on let him be focused, but I think his objective is to win a championship. I’m pretty sure he talked about that as well — and how he wants to help this team win. Everything else, he is who he is.
“He can talk about unicorns and rainbows for all I care. Just help us win some basketball games.”
[TD]Michigan (So.)[/TD]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]10[/TD]
[TD]C.J. McCollum[/TD]
[TD]PG/SG[/TD]
[TD]Portland Trail Blazers[/TD]
[TD]Lehigh (Sr.)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]11[/TD]
[TD]Michael Carter-Williams[/TD]
[TD]PG/SG[/TD]
[TD]Philadelphia 76ers[/TD]
[TD]Syracuse (So.)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]12[/TD]
[TD]Steven Adams[/TD]
[TD]C[/TD]
[TD]Oklahoma City Thunder (from Torontovia Houston)[SUP][a][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Pittsburgh (Fr.)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]13[/TD]
[TD]Kelly Olynyk[/TD]
[TD]C[/TD]
[TD]Dallas Mavericks (traded to Boston)[SUP][C][/SUP][/TD]
[TD]Gonzaga (Jr.)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]14[/TD]
[TD]Shabazz Muhammad[/TD]
[TD]SG/SF[/TD]
[TD]Utah Jazz (traded to Minnesota)[SUP]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_NBA_draft#cite_note-JazzTimberwolvestrade-5[/SUP][/TD]
[TD]UCLA (Fr.)[/TD]
[/TR]
So which piece of shit on this list would you have preferred? Oladipo is easily the best player on this list.
Given the situation in 2012-13 I doubt they would have wanted Oladipo given they thought Rose would be the star PG again at that time.Oladipo or McLemore
You can argue for Oladipo at SG next to Rose since he never really was a PG anyway.Given the situation in 2012-13 I doubt they would have wanted Oladipo given they thought Rose would be the star PG again at that time.
McLemore hasn't been that effective either, though saw a steady improvement last season.
I can, but I also play realism in what the front office has a tendency to think about.You can argue for Oladipo at SG next to Rose since he never really was a PG anyway.