Rose comes through in the clutch

[BullsZoneWill]

I want to see Rose play better in the playoffs before I give him the clutch label. But good to have him back to say the least.

He's single handily won plenty of games by scoring or assisting on the majority of plays down the stretch. He was clutch vs Pacers in the playoffs.

No matter how talented he is, its pretty tough when a 6'8 freak in James guards a 6'3, with shoes on, PG. Not much he can do there.

But otherwise he's clutch. But yes, I too want to see it more often in the Playoffs. But opposing teams know the Bulls are running a 1-4 flat everytime in closing, That makes it easy to defend. But he's still able to make a shot when we all know he's taking it.

 

[BullsZoneWill]

Brett outs himself as a tard again.

You can always count on that!!!!

 

[brett05]

You are risking being banned by threatening again BullZoneWill

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

 

[BIGGIEsmalls 23]

oh boy. Nevwrmind

You have no choice but to say "nevermind".

Your posts are making absolutely no sense & you're not providing any substance that counters the points of those that have disagreed with you.

 

[BullsZoneWill]

You are risking being banned by threatening again BullZoneWill

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

What are you talking about?! Threat?!C'mon bro give it a rest already....

 

[brett05]

And the ignore button is so needed with taptalk

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

 

[brett05]

You have no choice but to say "nevermind".

Your posts are making absolutely no sense & you're not providing any substance that counters the points of those that have disagreed with you.

You changed the definition to championships. That's why

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

 

[BIGGIEsmalls 23]

You changed the definition to championships. That's why

Well, explain to me & the board why the youngest ever MVP winner does not have "It" & is a step below other superstar players.....All of them needed another "It" player to win a title.

EDIT TO ADD:

Failure to explain your position (with substance) will confirm to me that you're simply trolling, which will allow me to depart this conversation with you.

 

[brett05]

Well, explain to me & the board why the youngest ever MVP winner does not have "It" & is a step below other superstar players.....All of them needed another "It" player to win a title.

EDIT TO ADD:

Failure to explain your position (with substance) will confirm to me that you're simply trolling, which will allow me to depart this conversation with you.

Feel free to leave. I've stated it on this board within the last week and to a lesser extent in this thread.

Explain to me that Jordan didn't have it before Scottie, magic after kareem, lebron prior to wade, wade prior to shaq, etc, ec

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

 

[BIGGIEsmalls 23]

Feel free to leave. I've stated it on this board within the last week and to a lesser extent in this thread.

What exactly have you stated?

Explain to me that Jordan didn't have it before Scottie,

Jordan is the G.O.A.T. & even he needed Scottie to win a championship, regardless of him having "It".

magic after kareem,

Magic did not win anymore championships after Kareem left, regardless of him having "It".

lebron prior to wade,

Lebron won zero (0) championships prior to joining up with Wade & Bosh, regardless of him having "It".

wade prior to shaq,

Wade was a rookie that helped his team past the first round. The team added Shaq that off-season & they won a championship 2 seasons later. Wade didn't win another championship until his second season of teaming with Lebron & Bosh, regardless of him having "It".

etc, ec

I would love to hear your other examples :thinking:.

 

[Icculus]

Brett and Joe having a bunch of posts in the Sox forum show why it's pretty weak on this site and retards like those two almost make me ashamed to be a White Sox fan. Also, I'm pretty sure he doesn't even watch basketball; probably too many uppity hip-hop loving Negroes with money for his taste.

 

[brett05]

What exactly have you stated?



Jordan is the G.O.A.T. & even he needed Scottie to win a championship, regardless of him having "It".


Magic did not win anymore championships after Kareem left, regardless of him having "It".


Lebron won zero (0) championships prior to joining up with Wade & Bosh, regardless of him having "It".


Wade was a rookie that helped his team past the first round. The team added Shaq that off-season & they won a championship 2 seasons later. Wade didn't win another championship until his second season of teaming with Lebron & Bosh, regardless of him having "It".


I would love to hear your other examples :thinking:.

So all those guys had "it" before winning a championship. Why you said they didn't still a mystery

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

 

[brett05]

Brett and Joe having a bunch of posts in the Sox forum show why it's pretty weak on this site and retards like those two almost make me ashamed to be a White Sox fan. Also, I'm pretty sure he doesn't even watch basketball; probably too many uppity hip-hop loving Negroes with money for his taste.

The next good post you make on any site Ziggy will get you up to one. Keep chasin'


Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

 

[BIGGIEsmalls 23]

So all those guys had "it" before winning a championship. Why you said they didn't still a mystery

Nowhere in this thread did I say that they did not have "It".

Like I suspected, you have absolutely no substance to back up your posts. I guess you expected to throw out your criticisms of Derrick Rose without anyone calling you on it.

 

[brett05]

Nowhere in this thread did I say that they did not have "It".

Like I suspected, you have absolutely no substance to back up your posts. I guess you expected to throw out your criticisms of Derrick Rose without anyone calling you on it.

I would politely ask you to re-read the posts on it, my answer to "exactly" and your ot post on championships.

You'll see at a minimum it can be interpreted just that way

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

 

[clonetrooper264]

So all those guys had "it" before winning a championship. Why you said they didn't still a mystery

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk

I find it a mystery that you're saying that he said that they did not have "it"

When did he say that?

 

[brett05]

I find it a mystery that you're saying that he said that they did not have "it"

When did he say that?

See my prev. Post

 

[scottiepippen1994]

 

[jcrab66]

Right now he's a turnover machine


Sent from the media deck using Tapatalk

 

[ChiSoxCity]

Might wanna cancel all these dumb ass Rose commercials, he just got schooled by a rookie and looks like dog chit one week into the season. This team is woefully underskilled and aging rapidly. Time for some trades (no, not suggesting we trade Rose).