SeriouslyImNotPace
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 29, 2016
- Posts:
- 299
- Liked Posts:
- 111
Can you name 3 to 4 rb's not named Elliot who might be the 1 in a committee. Love Langford, but feels like a strong two to me.
Booker is awesome. He might be better than Elliot
If you are going for an elite running back you just trade your first pick this year and try and get next years draft stocked with picks and trade up or hope you can get your hands on the best running back in the country in Leonard Fournette...
I would literally trade my first rounder this year just to secure a top 5 spot in next years draft.. Im trading with teams like cleveland and detroit for a 1st round pick next year so that I can get my hands on that guy... He is going to rule the NFL for a long time as a 3 down threat
[video=youtube;C88r97G-GSM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C88r97G-GSM[/video]
If we had ANY question about Langford we should have never let Forte go
Do we really want another RB who won't be any better than what we already have? For me the whole point of drafting Elliott at 11 would be because he's suppose to be the next big stud RB like AP. Now if we can't get Elliott & Cook 1-2, I want Lynch (or Goff if available) and secondary in the second round. I don't wanna waste a draft pick not improving a position or not improving it very much at least.
Out of sheer curiousity, if the Bears were so obsessed with drafting a stud top-10 quality RB why didn't they just draft Todd Gurley?