Variable
New member
- Joined:
- Jul 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,023
- Liked Posts:
- 122
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="The Count Dante" data-cid="207063" data-time="1374682790">
<div>
Just stop testing altogether.</p>
</p>
Does anyone still think professional (hell amateur too) do NOT take performance enhancing drugs?</p>
</p>
You dont want to come out and endorse them? Fine, just stop testing for em.</p>
</p>
And let the athlete's reach the potential they want to reach.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</p>
In general, it's always been looked at more harshly in baseball than in other sports. Mostly because of the records and numbers and all that. I'm kinda split on it, I definitely can understand, and lean more toward, the argument that PEDs can be looked at as part of sports, that it simply has become or has been a part of the competition and that's how it should be seen as, instead of going on witch hunts. But at the same time, I can see why the leagues would do that, why they would look at it that way, even if they turned a blind eye to it as they have in the past. Not necessarily for player safety as much as it is for image. I mean, when Bud Sellig says things like there has only been X amount of positive cases, he says like it's a ringing endorsement of the system working, while anyone with a brain can see it's the opposite.</p>
<div>
Just stop testing altogether.</p>
</p>
Does anyone still think professional (hell amateur too) do NOT take performance enhancing drugs?</p>
</p>
You dont want to come out and endorse them? Fine, just stop testing for em.</p>
</p>
And let the athlete's reach the potential they want to reach.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</p>
In general, it's always been looked at more harshly in baseball than in other sports. Mostly because of the records and numbers and all that. I'm kinda split on it, I definitely can understand, and lean more toward, the argument that PEDs can be looked at as part of sports, that it simply has become or has been a part of the competition and that's how it should be seen as, instead of going on witch hunts. But at the same time, I can see why the leagues would do that, why they would look at it that way, even if they turned a blind eye to it as they have in the past. Not necessarily for player safety as much as it is for image. I mean, when Bud Sellig says things like there has only been X amount of positive cases, he says like it's a ringing endorsement of the system working, while anyone with a brain can see it's the opposite.</p>