zabavka
The owls are not what they seem...
- Joined:
- Nov 4, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,314
- Liked Posts:
- 3,532
Maybe someone who understands this can explain it better.
The way I understand it is that after the top 53 salaries, anything under that doesn't count towards the yearly cap.
Is that correct?
If so all the people saying they still have half the team to fill to get to 90 players is going to dig into the cap is kinda bullshit.
A huge percentage of the guys added will be draft picks and undrafted free agents and on top of that the roster will get cut to 53 anyways for the season.
My point is why not use the money to get 1 or 2 higher priced free agents that will stick with the team and be starters instead of throwing out near league minimum one year deals for guys who won't even make the team come September?
The way I understand it is that after the top 53 salaries, anything under that doesn't count towards the yearly cap.
Is that correct?
If so all the people saying they still have half the team to fill to get to 90 players is going to dig into the cap is kinda bullshit.
A huge percentage of the guys added will be draft picks and undrafted free agents and on top of that the roster will get cut to 53 anyways for the season.
My point is why not use the money to get 1 or 2 higher priced free agents that will stick with the team and be starters instead of throwing out near league minimum one year deals for guys who won't even make the team come September?