SugarWalls
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 17, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,738
- Liked Posts:
- 7,510
No judgement do what you want I’m just saying idk what you’re talking about going on with the athletic and it ain’t meIt costs me a dollar a month.
No judgement do what you want I’m just saying idk what you’re talking about going on with the athletic and it ain’t meIt costs me a dollar a month.
No judgement do what you want I’m just saying idk what you’re talking about going on with the athletic and it ain’t me
The odd man out IMO is clearly cole kmet.
DJ Moore just signed an extension and did not play much in the slot in prior seasons. His high is 17.8%.
Burden is a slot specialist. I dont see him as a DJ Moore replacement
The bigger question mark is how they will utilize burden/loveland since both thrived out of the same spot in college.
It’s all good. There is a comment that is almost identical to what you posted here.
For all we know Johnson has said the OL moves this offseason are perfect and he just needs more playmakers & Allen has said the D roster is perfectly adequate but just add some talent to a few positions
People said the same thing about laremy tunsil and how he wasn’t a fit for the run scheme the bears had. People actually advocated for avoiding one of the best LT’s in the league because of this lmaoI also have a bad feeling about this whole “he doesn’t fit this guys scheme“ stuff. “We can’t draft him because he doesn’t fit DA’s scheme. He’s not big enough.” It very much has a “We traded Greg Olsen because he doesn’t fit the Mike Martz offense” feel to it.
Basically taking guys off the board because they don’t fit. Good players fit anywhere. I felt the last few months I’ve been reading about “fit“ way too much. When DA gets fired in two years (hopefully not. I’m just being realistic) nobody is going to give a shit about how so and so didn’t fit. It’s just going to be “why didn’t we draft this guy?” “Well, DA was our DC and he only wanted players that fit into this size/weight category and yada yada yada.” I can already see the stupidity that’s going to come from that mindset.
”Why did you trade Greg Olsen? He was a great player.”
“Well, Martz is the OC and he likes big blocking TE‘s. Olsen didn’t really fit into his scheme.” How stupid did that look?
I think they’re both done here sooner rather than later. Kmet’s fate was sealed Thursday night. But I also think for the most part the fan base knows that. (Except for the ones that keep repeating that Johsnon runs 2 TE sets. Which obviously is meaningless because the second TE is catching like 16 balls. We’re not paying Kmet 12 million or whatever it is to block and catch 16 balls a season. He’s gone.) I don’t think people have really accepted what drafting Burden means for Moore though.
There aren’t enough balls to go around. Too many mouths to feed. You don’t draft Burden that high with the depth you already have to make him your 3rd WR. Year one sure. Not beyond that though. Rome isn’t going anywhere. The most logical prediction is that Moore at some point becomes the odd man out.
I also don’t think Burden being a slot guy really matters. If you want to say Rome replaces Moore then okay. It’s all the same. There aren’t enough balls to go around and the two youngsters on rookie deals aren’t going anywhere. That leaves Moore.
The only way Moore is a Bear after next year is if Burden or Odunze becomes a bust. I guess one of them could get hurt as well.
Detroit ran the 3rd most 12 personnel. Kmet isn't going anywhere. Ben will be able to run the 2 TE sets he likes with Loveland and Kmet.
Believe it or not, having a dual TE set also helps the Tackles. I prefer to let it blow up before I start criticizing. I don't see any issues with what's been done so far.
I'm curious how you think we know nothing but then think BJ has the ability to know what he couldn't possibly know.
The whole point is nobody could know how the oline will be. What we do know is very clear, the oline sucked and this is Williams' 2nd year. It would be smart to overload on star oline than star weapons so if the oline isn't fixed there's a plan in place to have it fixed during the season.
It has absolutely nothing to do with knowing how players are that nobody can possibly know. It's about strategic moves which anyone can know.
Most expect him gone after this year to save considerable cap.
I think they’re both done here sooner rather than later. Kmet’s fate was sealed Thursday night. But I also think for the most part the fan base knows that. (Except for the ones that keep repeating that Johsnon runs 2 TE sets. Which obviously is meaningless because the second TE is catching like 16 balls. We’re not paying Kmet 12 million or whatever it is to block and catch 16 balls a season. He’s gone.) I don’t think people have really accepted what drafting Burden means for Moore though.
There aren’t enough balls to go around. Too many mouths to feed. You don’t draft Burden that high with the depth you already have to make him your 3rd WR. Year one sure. Not beyond that though. Rome isn’t going anywhere. The most logical prediction is that Moore at some point becomes the odd man out.
I also don’t think Burden being a slot guy really matters. If you want to say Rome replaces Moore then okay. It’s all the same. There aren’t enough balls to go around and the two youngsters on rookie deals aren’t going anywhere. That leaves Moore.
The only way Moore is a Bear after next year is if Burden or Odunze becomes a bust. I guess one of them could get hurt as well.
It’s not that us fans don’t know anything(it’s debatable sometimes, though). It’s just that we are only fans and don’t have access to all of the game film and, most importantly, don’t do this for a living. Hopefully Johnson and his new coaching staff can review film and tease out any potential from the previous roster. The point of my post is simply that we aren’t privy to the position room coaches’ meetings to know what any of them actually think. All we have is game day and, in this specific instance, all of the draft-centric coverage by “draft gurus”.
I understand that this post is a major appeal to authority fallacy but that’s what we have to go on right now. Once the season starts and we get evidence that Johnson does or does not have what it takes to be a successful head coach then, sure, be critical to your heart’s content.
But right now stop(not you specifically, just in general) with the conclusion jumping with all of the incomplete information available.
I’m going to give Morgan a slight pass. I remember him being a decent OL coach when he was hired and before Waldren was hired the OL was at least middle of the pack, not amazing but not complete garbage. As soon as Waldren showed up he wanted to run some new blocking scheme that was confusing and didn’t suit the players skill set. That and Waldren being a complete tool are my interpretations of why the offense was such trashI fully admit my assessment of the new FA oline is very shallow. And I really don't care to go into it deeper, I'd rather wait and see than waste my summer analyzing.
But Poles' authority has been to mostly ignore oline, do little to identify and fix problems on the oline, and his history here has been to defend obvious problems.
I would hope that even if someone still doesn't believe Morgan was an issue that every Bear fan was floored when Poles said Whitehair was a good center. And then that was his excuse to avoid the best Center draft I recall (even if there were as good or better before I was paying attention to drafts that's still a long time I have been).
So these professionals are fallible and they have bias. And most of all they will lie to cover their asses to do whatever they want. Poles wanted to give his HC DBs so Poles lied and told us Whitehair was a good Center, and we all knew it was a lie and that there was no way he watched any film to say that.
I just can't have blind faith for a new HC I know little about.
I’m going to give Morgan a slight pass. I remember him being a decent OL coach when he was hired and before Waldren was hired the OL was at least middle of the pack, not amazing but not complete garbage. As soon as Waldren showed up he wanted to run some new blocking scheme that was confusing and didn’t suit the players skill set. That and Waldren being a complete tool are my interpretations of why the offense was such trash
To some degree a GM works for the HC(I can’t wait for this to be taken wildly out of context). If the HC says he needs X style of players, why wouldn’t the GM sign these players? If Eberflus and his coordinators were telling Poles to sign everyone on the roster and he got them, doesn’t this reflect more negatively on Eberflus? But listen, I get the criticism of Poles as well. Hopefully this Johnson/Allen team will work
My problem with the offseason in general and especially one where there are so many changes is not that people have questions or concerns. It’s the typical overreaction and/or jumping to ridiculous conclusions, like the original premise of this thread.