Should There Be a Serious Posters Forum?

[Penny Traitor]

What are the qualifications.........asking for a friend

Qualifications to Mod a forum that does not exist?

I imagine bringing said forum existence would be a great start. Then you just send a friendly PM to @Rush why you want to be a Mod.

Worked for me!

DISCLAIMER: @Rush only logs on four times a year so you may be waiting for days/weeks/months.

 

[Leomaz]

Qualifications to Mod a forum that does not exist?

I imagine bringing said forum existence would be a great start. Then you just send a friendly PM to @Rush why you want to be a Mod.

Worked for me!

DISCLAIMER: @Rush only logs on four times a year so you may be waiting for days/weeks/months.

I meant what are the qualifications to post in the serious posters forum......but your answer clears up other questions....I appreciate it

 

[Penny Traitor]

I meant what are the qualifications to post in the serious posters forum......but your answer clears up other questions....I appreciate it

Oh.

Again...bringing it into existence is a good start, but I imagine anyone wanting to post there should be completely devoid of humor, wit or original thoughts.

Just parrot everything everyone else says and you should do great! I would say I will see you there, but it sounds ****ing boring.

 

[Leomaz]

Oh.

Again...bringing it into existence is a good start, but I imagine anyone wanting to post there should be completely devoid of humor, wit or original thoughts.

Just parrot everything everyone else says and you should do great! I would say I will see you there, but it sounds ****ing boring.

So fake it til you make it......

 

[Penny Traitor]

So fake it til you make it......

You can't "fake it". You gotta commit to being a soulless robot from Day One boyo.

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

You can't "fake it". You gotta commit to being a soulless robot from Day One boyo.

A trial run for a "Serious posts only" forum is the answer...that would be great.

 

[zack54attack]

If we did a trial run, it would be for donators. I think everyone would be cool with that?

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

If we did a trial run, it would be for donators. I think everyone would be cool with that?

I think it would be great entertainment and doubt it could ever stay serious.

 

[HeHateMe]

I'll volunteer myselve as mod of this trial forum @zack54attack

I am an expert in spotting any sort of "funny biz" and can give you a 10000% guarantee that any non-serious posts that arise would be dealt with extreme prejudice.

 

[Penny Traitor]

10000% guarantee

That math is hyperbole which is not serious at all.

Application denied.

 

[CRM 114]

That math is hyperbole which is not serious at all.

Application denied.

At least he used a real number unlike @Omeletpants

 

[HeHateMe]

That math is hyperbole which is not serious at all.

Application denied.

I wouldn't let any bull**** like that fly in the real serious persons only forum FYI. IT was literally an example!!!

 

[Hawkeye OG]

If we did a trial run, it would be for donators. I think everyone would be cool with that?

I will just start taking my serious posts to the donator forum

 

[Spunky Porkstacker]

I'll volunteer myselve as mod of this trial forum @zack54attack

I am an expert in spotting any sort of "funny biz" and can give you a 10000% guarantee that any non-serious posts that arise would be dealt with extreme prejudice.

As displayed in the @dabears70 thread in the bar last eve @oober has more than shown he is the "perfect candidate" for the serious poster thread moderator.

 

[Tostada]

What are your thoughts on this? I think it might be a great idea. Especially for posters like @dabears70 and @xer0h0ur.

This way they can discuss ball rotation on punts, or 2nd and long play calls in Week 1 vs. 2nd and long play calls in Week 16, or really anything that the "serious people" discuss without the funny banter of those who annoy them so much.

This question should be posted in 'The Serious Poster' forum where it belongs.

 

[KoreanBear]

Who decides who are serious enough or not?

 

[GigECJ]

"won't work...wash, rinse, repeat."

not if it's excessively moderated (which, of course, is a lot to ask)

Hawk.com used to have the "worst of the worst" (typically during Canucks games--certain 'nuck fans), but we had a quality NHL referee in "BIB" who was terrific. He singlehandedly got rid of ALL the juvenile flack. There would be few that got through afterward, but they were "mauled." It eventually stopped almost completely.

 

[Crystallas]

So far we're requiring two forms of ID and tax statements for verification. Ommy appied, but doesn't make enough for any tax returns. So you know it's working.

 

[number51]

"won't work...wash, rinse, repeat."

not if it's excessively moderated (which, of course, is a lot to ask)

Hawk.com used to have the "worst of the worst" (typically during Canucks games--certain 'nuck fans), but we had a quality NHL referee in "BIB" who was terrific. He singlehandedly got rid of ALL the juvenile flack. There would be few that got through afterward, but they were "mauled." It eventually stopped almost completely.

That sounds boring as hell, I assume it no longer exists and that why you are here at this silly place.

 

[MDB111™]

That sounds boring as hell, I assume it no longer exists and that why you are here at this silly place.

Are you serious about it being silly? This new forum needs to happen soon or I am going to catch autism.