- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,145
No Way?!?!?!?You're a fucking moron, the disscussion is not if home field is better than playing on the road but if the risk of losing a key player to injury is worth the risk of playing for home field.
Really?
So your thought was:If the Bears can get the #1 seed they should try to. If they can't rest the starters. How original!
Relapse does have a point FT. The Falcons are very tough to beat at home. (7-1) I think. And 2 of the Bears 3 losses came when we were struggling early in the season, so I don't think home field would be a disadvantage for the Bears.
Still, I think the Bears have the kind of offense that would benefit from playing in a dome, and the Falcons would be hurt by playing outdoors, so I think the Bears have a good shot at beating them, either way.
The entire NFC is a ball of average. Any team could go anywhere and beat anyone. I mean the Bears were one Calvin Johnson "drop" away from being 4-4 at home this season.
You're second point about playing in a dome with our offensive and defensive speed is an interesting one though and has a lot of merit.
...
Last edited: