Slate article on Capital Punishment

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
Funny I can look up the definition online and find it where it lacks the word "unlawfully"



and using the two popular online dictionaries I figured you got your definition from webster but you cherry picked.

My appologies for not providing a link, but yes, I used Merriam-Websters.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
The death penalty is murder by the government. Civilized people should be outraged by it.



(unless they are pro-life)

It's nice to know that I'm not the only shit stirrer around here. It warms the cockles of my heart! Peace, love, and harmony, Bob!
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
The death penalty is murder by the government. Civilized people should be outraged by it.



(unless they are pro-life)



Believe it or not that is the exact point Ron Paul makes. If you are pro-life logically you have to be against capital punishment.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,852
Liked Posts:
2,553
Kill them all, let God sort them out? I mean seriously, if we execute an innocent man who cares? It was God's will.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Kill them all, let God sort them out? I mean seriously, if we execute an innocent man who cares? It was God's will.



Execution must be right they executed Jesus
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,681
Liked Posts:
3,049
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
The death penalty is murder by the government. Civilized people should be outraged by it.



(unless they are pro-life)

Since when are people civilized?
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,107
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL
Since when are people civilized?

**** Off!
<
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
There are other punishments besides death.
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,107
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL
No crime should go unpunished. If people would stop murdering other people, then there would be no need for executions.



Chicken or the egg my friend...



If killing is so wrong, why would two wrongs make a right, especially when the state's taking of life is often more premeditated then the person being executed.



It also send the message to folks with limited analytical abilities that if it's good enough for the state to execute someone who's done wrong, then why don't I have the same right to take matters into my own hands when I feel someone's done me wrong.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
There are other punishments besides death.

Right, like letting them rot in a jail cell for upwards of 60 years all the while supported by TAX PAYERS. Great solution.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Right, like letting them rot in a jail cell for upwards of 60 years all the while supported by TAX PAYERS. Great solution.



which has been proven to be cheaper than killing them due to all the last minute appeals and crap which then clog up an already slow judicial system. Yeah kill'em great solution.



Or I don't know how about we try to reform them instead of just stick them in a box or zap them. Will be able to be reformed? No but there are some that will be able to return to society and function
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
If killing is so wrong, why would two wrongs make a right, especially when the state's taking of life is often more premeditated then the person being executed.



It also send the message to folks with limited analytical abilities that if it's good enough for the state to execute someone who's done wrong, then why don't I have the same right to take matters into my own hands when I feel someone's done me wrong.



Hey hey no need to use logic in this argument
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
If killing is so wrong, why would two wrongs make a right, especially when the state's taking of life is often more premeditated then the person being executed.



It also send the message to folks with limited analytical abilities that if it's good enough for the state to execute someone who's done wrong, then why don't I have the same right to take matters into my own hands when I feel someone's done me wrong.

I already talked about this, but let me put it this way. The state convicts a murderer and puts them in jail for life. That is the state TAKING their LIFE from them. So what is the difference? In one sense, people feel better about themselves because that person is still alive and could maybe someday possibly hopefully luckily if the stars align be exhonerated of their crime and freed.



As for the deterence factor for small minded folks; you answered your own question, "it's good enough for the state to execute someone who's done wrong". No citizen is above the law, and unless they are on duty as the law, they don't get to make that decision.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
which has been proven to be cheaper than killing them due to all the last minute appeals and crap which then clog up an already slow judicial system. Yeah kill'em great solution.



Or I don't know how about we try to reform them instead of just stick them in a box or zap them. Will be able to be reformed? No but there are some that will be able to return to society and function



Proven HOW? All I have ever seen or heard is rhetoric and talking points. I have never read an article or seen a website (government, educational, or private) with a total number of retrial or appeal attempts and the associated costs vice the true cost of lifetime incarceration for all the death row inmates in the country for the last X years. Find that and you have an argument, otherwise it is just hearsay.



Same thing goes for rehabilitation. All rhetoric when it comes to murderers being rehabilitated. Show me how many one time murderers went to jail and never did it again vice all the repeat offenders. I am fairly certain you won't be happy with the success rate of rehabilitation. Once a killer always a killer (just waiting for the next homicidal urge to appear that they fail to repress).
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,107
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL
I already talked about this, but let me put it this way. The state convicts a murderer and puts them in jail for life. That is the state TAKING their LIFE from them. So what is the difference? In one sense, people feel better about themselves because that person is still alive and could maybe someday possibly hopefully luckily if the stars align be exhonerated of their crime and freed.



As for the deterence factor for small minded folks; you answered your own question, "it's good enough for the state to execute someone who's done wrong". No citizen is above the law, and unless they are on duty as the law, they don't get to make that decision.



Well we're probably never going to agree on this, but I think our government should be above doing the same thing they find so reprehensible.
 

BigPete

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
5,010
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Belleville, IL
Hey hey no need to use logic in this argument



You are right, you love to reject my logic. A lifetime of NO FREEDOM is so much better than NO LIFE AT ALL. Sorry Charlie, but they are equal in my mind.



There is no guarantee that just because a person is still incarcerated that they will have an appeal honored and heard. So that is a wash too. Is there a chance, yes. Is there a chance that I will win the lottery, yes.
 

Top