Re:So what's after
dougthonus wrote:
collisrost wrote:
I think it's a fabulous system. The only problem is I'm not sure I'd rather be Ron Harper than Luc Longley. I mean it's LUUUUUUUUUC!
This was sort of the most confusing part about rating the different players. Would you take Kukoc over Rodman, Paxson over Armstrong. I tried to separate guys into what I considered to be pretty clear tiers, but it's still only so-so.
It's also why I used only retired players. Where would Derrick Rose go on the list? How about Ben Gordon? One year they may be somewhere and the next they'd be totally different.
That's why i've decided to never post again... I want to be Luc forever
Seriously it really doesn't matter how the players are ranked, it's all in good fun and it's way more appealing than what most message boards do.
Just off the top of my head, since we're really commenting on the game rather than playing it, wouldn't it make more sense to be named after sportswriters and commentators. You can have newbies be "Neil Funk" and then "Sam Smith" and so on... all the way up to the superexcellent "Ray Clay."
Actually, it might make sense to use the karma meter to rate posters....
Nah. What Doug put together is perfect!
