- Joined:
- Feb 18, 2011
- Posts:
- 4,941
- Liked Posts:
- 993
- Location:
- Oak Lawn/Chicago
yeah, like i said wouldnt mind em, but we did trade em first right? just wondering.
yeah, like i said wouldnt mind em, but we did trade em first right? just wondering.
Instead of looking at our team chemistry as something the we can afford to sacrifice a little of, we need to grow it even further.
Wrong Nugget.
Wilson Chandler.
And he could here.I know he played the 2
He seemed to do fine in NYK and Denver. I really didn't see anything showing me he couldn't keep up or get by 2 guards in either conference.but he is huge at 6-8 to be a 2 and wouldnt be able to keep up with or get past a lot of 2s.
He's not a very good ball handler and a poor outside shooter I'll take JR Smtih
And he could here.
He seemed to do fine in NYK and Denver. I really didn't see anything showing me he couldn't keep up or get by 2 guards in either conference.
Not sure how him being huge at 6-8 is a bad thing?
He's a better career shotoer than JR..except from 3. JR isn't that good of a ball handler either. Chandler can handle a big but with Rose on the team I'm not really that worried about it.
JR has also never been a consistant starter in the league and I think there's a good reason for that. I'd rather get a starting 2 guard with a better all around game than get a 2 who has never really been a starter and is more one dimensional.
Draft a PG or find a true back up PG.Smith is a better ball handler than Chandler and we need ball handling on this team to relieve Rose
And how is Smith 1 dimensional?
Draft a PG or find a true back up PG.
Assuming CJ Watson is gone?
He's a shooter and not much else. Not a guy you can trust to handle the ball, not a real good defender, he's an athletic wing but aside from 3pt shooting he's not a real offensive threat otherwise.
I would argue that JR Smith isn't a "true 2" either. He's an athletic shooter off the bench. If we are bringing him in to start I think it would be a big mistake.