spawned from bri's topic...Would you marry for money?

[bri]

People on here have said they would marry for money and other people have been supportive of that like it is a good reason. I find that shallow possessions are more important than love. But as I stated earlier in this thread that the person being used has a responsibility also because they are the ones letting themselves be used for the other person's selfish gain.

 

[sth]

Your right Bri. It seems like that there are a lot of people out there who care more about possessions and stuff than if they really like someone. You know a lot of the people being used are in it for something too. Look at the rich old guys that marry the young hot gals. They are in it for sex.

 

[LordKOTL]

In my case material things always bore me after awhile. Paying for something involves a certainty which I just don't like. To me there's less satisfaction in someone doing something you love out of the blue than there is for someone to actually do it.



I don't belive in love conquers all or any of that candyland shit, but unless live throws me a curveball, or I thorw life a curveball every now and then I'd be bored.

 

[winos5]

You can't buy love, but you can have a hell of a lot of fun trying to.

 

[JOVE23]

You can't buy love

Everybody tells me so.

 

[CaveMan]

Money can buy you silicone....