Stanley Cup Final IGT: Game 2 - Blackhawks @ Lightning 6/6 at 6:15 p.m.

Joined:
Oct 1, 2014
Posts:
149
Liked Posts:
45
LOL Another dummy calling the ONLY goal he let in Game 1 soft, essentially.

I can't wait for the Hawks to be bad again so people like you go away.

I've been a Hawks fan since the late 90s. Even during the Arnason, Bell and Calder dark ages. It doesn't matter that it was the only goal he let in in game 1. It was SOFT.

I can't wait for the Hawks to be bad again so people like you stop acting like you know real crap about hockey.
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,886
Liked Posts:
26,376
I've been a Hawks fan since the late 90s. Even during the Arnason, Bell and Calder dark ages. It doesn't matter that it was the only goal he let in in game 1. It was SOFT.

I can't wait for the Hawks to be bad again so people like you stop acting like you know real crap about hockey.

loololololloloolloollolololololololoolololololloollol
 

TCD

New member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2014
Posts:
3,339
Liked Posts:
1,597
Still not concerned. Hawks have Tampa right where they want em. 3rd period dominance brewing. Hawks know how to take a game in a third period of hockey. Duncs hasn't even tried yet.

Toews sure does suck balls tonight though so far. Kane not much better and Saad back to garbage.

but lets keep waiting for Craw to let in 1 soft goal so we can blame the world on him.

fucking nuggets all of you. Go away.
 

Mr. Jones

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 22, 2012
Posts:
4,438
Liked Posts:
1,121
A very winnable game thus far.a split going home was expected, but.a win and up 2-0 would be fuckin great..
 

CRM 114

Premium Member
Donator
Joined:
Dec 9, 2013
Posts:
13,107
Liked Posts:
4,276
I've been a Hawks fan since the late 90s. Even during the Arnason, Bell and Calder dark ages. It doesn't matter that it was the only goal he let in in game 1. It was SOFT.

I can't wait for the Hawks to be bad again so people like you stop acting like you know real crap about hockey.

It wasn't a soft goal you nitwit. I don't care how long you have been a Hawks fan.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
The post has made better saves than Crawford. Unfortunately, they can't stop them all
 

Mr. Jones

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 22, 2012
Posts:
4,438
Liked Posts:
1,121
Great save there by Crawford..lucky to be down only 1 goal with Tampa taking advantage of TOs..heck of a game but gotta bring it in the final 20..
 

CRM 114

Premium Member
Donator
Joined:
Dec 9, 2013
Posts:
13,107
Liked Posts:
4,276
I'd recommend undergoing psychological evaluation if you thought the TB goal in Game 1 was soft or fluky.
 

CRM 114

Premium Member
Donator
Joined:
Dec 9, 2013
Posts:
13,107
Liked Posts:
4,276
I've been a Hawks fan since the late 90s. Even during the Arnason, Bell and Calder dark ages. It doesn't matter that it was the only goal he let in in game 1. It was SOFT.

I can't wait for the Hawks to be bad again so people like you stop acting like you know real crap about hockey.

I'd shoot some red bars your way, but Scoot/Crys/Rush haven't enabled it yet.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
I've been a Hawks fan since the late 90s. Even during the Arnason, Bell and Calder dark ages. It doesn't matter that it was the only goal he let in in game 1. It was SOFT.

I can't wait for the Hawks to be bad again so people like you stop acting like you know real crap about hockey.

Adam Munro would have stopped it
 
Joined:
Oct 1, 2014
Posts:
149
Liked Posts:
45
I'd recommend undergoing psychological evaluation if you thought the TB goal in Game 1 was soft or fluky.

There is a clear difference between a "Soft" goal and a "Lucky" goal. The game 1 deflection was brilliant, but with Killorn being wide open (and if you look at the replay he was WIDE OPEN) down by the edge of the faceoff circle, Crawford should have expected a pass or shot to go in his direction, thus he should have had a skate and leg right against the post. If he does that that puck doesn't go in.

The deflection today for the tying goal, was definitely less on Crawford, but you cant let a puck that is deflected at that distance from the goal to beat you near post.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
34,893
Liked Posts:
19,042
What a bunch of soft saves by Crawford!

Sorry. Couldn't hear you. I was listening to the intermission report, where NHL experts are discussing how poorly Crawford is playing tonight.
 

CRM 114

Premium Member
Donator
Joined:
Dec 9, 2013
Posts:
13,107
Liked Posts:
4,276
Third period belongs to us. Let's win this thing, preferably in regulation.

This is a wild game, long ways to go still

Welcome to the Forums. Be on the look out for a poster named The Hawk. Very evil child
 

italianbeef

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2015
Posts:
822
Liked Posts:
167
Keep attacking Bishop. He's a marshmallow.

Unfortunately, so is Crow. If he gets lazy protecting the post one more time, I'd go to Darling. That's 3 of 4 Tampa goals where he was sleeping and they got him short side.
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,886
Liked Posts:
26,376
Sorry. Couldn't hear you. I was listening to the intermission report, where NHL experts are discussing how poorly Crawford is playing tonight.

You have to listen to talking heads on TV instead of watching/analyzing the game yourself?

Must be a new fan.
 

Top