- Joined:
- Sep 28, 2014
- Posts:
- 8,622
- Liked Posts:
- 10,255
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
But why does it matter that it stopped by 08? This is based off each players best season at the position.
- Status
But why does it matter that it stopped by 08? This is based off each players best season at the position.
SuperDitkaMan
BANNED
- Joined:
- Oct 15, 2016
- Posts:
- 1,123
- Liked Posts:
- 241
- Joined:
- Sep 28, 2014
- Posts:
- 8,622
- Liked Posts:
- 10,255
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
[video=youtube_share;rGtxZlQwxNQ]https://youtu.be/rGtxZlQwxNQ[/video]
SuperDitkaMan
BANNED
- Joined:
- Oct 15, 2016
- Posts:
- 1,123
- Liked Posts:
- 241
If you wanna include playoffs in your list that's fine.
I did not.
If I had, then yes Hesters 06 at KR would probably trump Mannings '08 at KR.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,163
So ummm...
Based on your team above why do you think the Bears haven't won another Super Bowl since 1985?
Based on your team above why do you think the Bears haven't won another Super Bowl since 1985?
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,452
- Liked Posts:
- 9,990
It is logical because same players can change and sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. Look at the Cubs this year. A lot of players playing worse than they did last year. So back to the late 80s Bears... when you DON'T see several of the 85 stars on the list, it brings a point that they might have struggled later in their career after 85.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,163
Bears_804
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,712
- Liked Posts:
- 1,401
oh boy
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,452
- Liked Posts:
- 9,990
Well gee, probably one of the most recognizable names in sports history is missing.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,452
- Liked Posts:
- 9,990
Does Rory ever enter a thread he doesn't get confused in? Does anyone have any examples of this rare phenomenon?
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,163
Payton was mentioned in the initial post and he had a great 1986, OP just chose Anderson's 1989 over him...........Was Payton falling off a limiting factor? The Bears were back in the NFC CG in 1988 with Anderson at RB. They replaced one AllPro/PB'er with another.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,452
- Liked Posts:
- 9,990
Perhaps. If Payton would have had a better year in 1986, they might not have been upset by the Redskins.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,163
What would Payton's season of 1986 have to do with an individual playoff game?
Was the 1986 playoff game an upset? Why?
Payton's last two games of the 1985 playoffs were bad performances.
Last edited:
- Joined:
- Aug 25, 2012
- Posts:
- 16,920
- Liked Posts:
- 11,734
- Location:
- Funk & Wagnalls' porch
My favorite teams
Not sure what this means, I guess it's a reference to this:
FT tried to use math and failed, I helped him out, a thank you would be nice.
I pointed out the fact that the OP listed O and D starters and ST players. Do you think there are backup kickers? Weird.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,452
- Liked Posts:
- 9,990
If he had a better season, maybe the Redskins focus more of their scheming towards stopping him. Maybe it opens up other areas for the Bears to attack.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,452
- Liked Posts:
- 9,990
FT is an english major without a hope at finding a real job. Give him some slack here.
Bears_804
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,712
- Liked Posts:
- 1,401
Lord. I really don't understand the culture here at times.
Rory/FT dig into post and ask pretty black and white questions. People either skirt the questions or answer with something irrelevant.
When the question is repeated bc it wasn't really answered, they are told to be trolls. Not really trolling IMO. May be a bit unnecessary or and annoying sometimes, but when you can't just ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG these fucking pages go on for days and nothing of substance is really there other than another argument.
Answer the question, say you're wrong, or move on.
Rory/FT dig into post and ask pretty black and white questions. People either skirt the questions or answer with something irrelevant.
When the question is repeated bc it wasn't really answered, they are told to be trolls. Not really trolling IMO. May be a bit unnecessary or and annoying sometimes, but when you can't just ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG these fucking pages go on for days and nothing of substance is really there other than another argument.
Answer the question, say you're wrong, or move on.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,163
The above bolded makes no sense given actual reality of what occurred, general football strategy, and overall logic.
Serious question:
Over the last few weeks you've gone back to "obtuse/non-sensible" poster schtick. I'm trying to figure out why. I want to assume you're a decently intelligent individual based on brief glimpses when you've dropped the act and just posted and had discussions. Why have you gone back to the weak "clueless poster" troll job stuff? Why not just post like a normal human being and have actual discussions?
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 20,452
- Liked Posts:
- 9,990
The Bears were 7 point favorites. By definition, it was an upset.
- Joined:
- May 4, 2010
- Posts:
- 27,077
- Liked Posts:
- 15,163
- Status
Staff online NOW
-
clonetrooper264Retired Bandwagon Mod -
zack54attackBears
