<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="The Canadian Dreamalchuk" data-cid="230139" data-time="1400560101">
<div>
Steeg didn't do anything bad in game #1 to jump on the "bench him in game 2" wagon. He actually played fairly well. Bench this guy..bench that guy...call up this guy...call up that guy...bench this guy..blah blah blah. All this benching and shit fucks up a team. No different than revolving lines every game which everyone bitched about. Stick with some consistency unless it's injury related or someone really starts shitting the bed like Steeg did in earlier series. Until he does that again no point in benching him. New series folks.</p>
</p>
Neither Versteeg or Bollig need to benched for game 2. You come off a win and a pretty good one you don't start benching anyone at all. Makes zero fucking sense. </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</p>
</p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Spunky Porkstacker" data-cid="230172" data-time="1400607506">
<div>
Who sits when Shaw comes back?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
Bingo. I wouldn't get upset if Shaw used the extra days to heal, but if he's ready, one of Bollig or Versteeg has to schelp for Weiderman & Murray. </p>
</p>
Between the two; 6 of 1, half a dozen of the other. Bollig might be a slug on the ice and take a bad penalty now and again but he at least plays the corners, hits, and is somewhat responsible defensively if you don't expect him to hurry back into the zone to cover for Rosivbal's blunders. Versteeg might net you a goal at the same clip Sharp does but he's got the hockey sense of Stalberg; he will be a defensive liability and unlike 2010 he doesn't have the wheels to cover for his mistakes.</p>
</p>
Regin sits only if Q's trying to tank the team.</p>