How can you(CURRENTLY) even consider Lebron in the top 100? He gives up when he gets upset.
wait...what...? some of the top guys in nba history never won. are you telling me that guys like stockton, malone, barkley, nash, baylor aren't top 100 players in nba history because they didn't come up big in the clutch? does this mean you can't put scottie, david robinson, clyde drexler, dirk (until this year) in the top 100 because they shrunk in the clutch? does this mean reggie miller all of a sudden becomes a top 10 player because he didn't shrink in the clutch? hell no.
i don't think it's a question that lebron james is the most complete basketball player that we have seen since michael jordan. to some extent yes, he puts up some empty stats, but there is no question in my mind that if lebron james wasn't a ******, any team would give up any player for lebron. just because he has come up short in his first eight seasons does not mean that he's not up there.
many will say that jordan was never upset and that's lebron expectations. well no one is jordan. but magic, bird, kobe, kareem, wilt, everyone else, they were upset. lebron has only had one team that was expected to win anything and they came up short in the nba finals. or have we forgotten the series that our beloved bulls were eliminated in?
plus unfortunately, i think you have to assume that lebron wins eventually which pushes him up the list.
like it or not (and i freaking hate it) but if i didn't have a likable superstar on my team that could beat him, i would give up my whole roster for lebron james and you would too.
now i have to go hit my head against the wall for writing a defense of lebron james. thanks a lot guys.