The current favorites for Fielder

Shawon0Meter

PLAYOFFS?!?
Donator
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
5,444
Liked Posts:
2,774
Location:
Minnesota
Article from Jon Heyman on SI.com

1. Orioles. They've used power-hitting but strikeout-prone Mark Reynolds and Chris Davis at first base since trading Derrek Lee, but it isn't certain how sold they are on either one. They tried for Baltimore native Mark Teixeira three winters ago, and there are whispers Orioles owner Peter Angelos may open his checkbook.

2. Cubs. It's hard to say what they might try considering they don't have a GM yet (and aren't likely to hire one this month). But with Carlos Peña a free agent, they would appear to have an opening. They could also take a poke at the NL Central-rival Brewers by stealing their biggest star and set themselves up for three-fourths of a superb under-30 infield, with also 21-year-old shortstop Starlin Castro and 25-year-old second baseman Darwin Barney.

3. Rangers. They already have one of the best three or four lineups in baseball but could really complete it with the addition of Fielder, who'd have to love the Rangers' ballpark. They are not afraid of free agency, as they showed last year by signing Adrian Beltre.

4. Nationals. They are also obviously unafraid of free agency (see Jayson Werth) and have worked extensively with agent Scott Boras in the past (Stephen Strasburg, Bryce Harper, Anthony Rendon, Danny Espinosa, Alex Cora, Rick Ankiel and Werth). The Lerners, who are thought to be baseball's richest single owners, are acting like they are going to make a push in one of baseball's tougher divisions. Mike Morse can play the outfield, though there remains the question of where Rendon, their top draft pick last June, will play (it would seem that Rendon and Ryan Zimmerman would man first and third base, eventually, though Rendon might be able to play second).

5. Dodgers. It's hard to say whether their bankruptcy will kill their winter. But if Frank McCourt sells some of his many mansions or MLB is fortunate enough to be rid of him, Fielder would be a perfect fit. Actually, the Dodgers might have been competitive this year with just one more big offensive force.

6. Brewers. Some have written them off, but say this for Attanasio: He certainly tries hard. It is believed his first offer, awhile back, was something like $120 million over six years, with the opt out. Fielder is seen as the clear leader on a beloved Brewers team. Attanasio has done a magnificent job maximizing revenues, but of course it would probably still take a stretch to keep Fielder, as he himself suggested.

7. Mariners. They definitely need the offense, and GM Jack Zduriencik and scouting director Tom McNamara absolutely love Fielder after they picked him for the Brewers back when Zduriencik was their scouting director and McNamara the scout. They also have the revenue.

8. Cardinals. Their real effort, of course, is directed at trying to keep their own icon Pujols. They are seen as the favorite to do so, though nothing's certain. If they don't get Pujols, well, they have the spot and the money set aside.

9. Marlins. They're talking about spending big, and Fielder is a Florida product (Melbourne, four hours up the east coast from Miami), so we'll include them here. But they have Gaby Sanchez at first base and other, bigger needs. They aren't exactly used to opening their wallets, either. We'll believe they'll spend when we actually see it.

Orioles lead current favorites for free-agent-to-be Prince Fielder - Jon Heyman - SI.com
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
If Fielder wants to compete, there's really only three choices for him on that list. Rangers, Cardinals, Cubs.
 

X

When one letter is enough
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
24,664
Liked Posts:
7,783
Honestly, I won't be surprised if fielder goes to:

Cards.gif

Think about it. Almost the same production as their current 1b, only cheaper, younger, and left-handed.

ugh.
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
Honestly, I won't be surprised if fielder goes to:

Cards.gif

Think about it. Almost the same production as their current 1b, only cheaper, younger, and left-handed.

ugh.

I agree. Outside of Texas, the Cards are the next best team on that list if he wants to win.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats

:yeah:

Chicago-Cubs-1908-World-Ser.gif


cobs.jpg


Honestly though, I think Ricketts has put enough emphasis on building from the farm that we can expect Pena & Colvin or Colvin & Byrd at 1st and RF... or (gulp) LaHair and Colvin.
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
If Fielder wants a shot at winning the Cubs are not an option
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
If Fielder wants a shot at winning the Cubs are not an option

a bit definite dont you think?

i think the big market of the cubs is certainly attractive

the cubs have some good pieces in place as well and might make bring in some FAs..plus i think the cubs,if some moves are made, could be near 90 wins in a couple of seasons..fielder would really help(of course he himself will not make the cubs a playoff team..i think there's more to it than that)

although in the current situations the rangers and cardinals are better options for winning...

and i do have my doubts about fielder coming here, for sure
 

Shawon0Meter

PLAYOFFS?!?
Donator
Joined:
Feb 9, 2011
Posts:
5,444
Liked Posts:
2,774
Location:
Minnesota
The Cubs World Series drought isn't gonna affect Prince Fielder signing with the Cubs. It hasn't been one big 103 year fail, it's a bunch of individual fails. The Jim Hendry era has nothing to do with what happened 20 years ago. It can be turned around at any time.

Prince Fielder is gonna sign at least a 7 year deal, the Cubs will make the playoffs at least a couple times in that span with him or without him. There's a decent chance they'll even be the favorite in one of those years.

I don't know if the Cubs are interested in him, I don't know if he's interested in the Cubs, but there's plenty of reasons for a great player to come here and plenty of reasons a great GM will wanna come here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: X

inactiveuser1

The Legend
Donator
Joined:
Sep 11, 2011
Posts:
8,250
Liked Posts:
2,804
Thank you to wrigley fire hawks for his first two posts on this topic, he took the words straight out of my mouth
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Thank you to wrigley fire hawks for his first two posts on this topic, he took the words straight out of my mouth

Thank the posts then :shifty:

:troll:
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
a bit definite dont you think?

i think the big market of the cubs is certainly attractive

the cubs have some good pieces in place as well and might make bring in some FAs..plus i think the cubs,if some moves are made, could be near 90 wins in a couple of seasons..fielder would really help(of course he himself will not make the cubs a playoff team..i think there's more to it than that)

although in the current situations the rangers and cardinals are better options for winning...

and i do have my doubts about fielder coming here, for sure
Put the kookaid down. If it's about winning I'm not sure where the Cubs would rank. 20-25 is probable.

Now if winning isn't important considering the money is close than the Cubs have a shot.

But I see Fielder as a winner unlike current Pena/Lee. And it's not my hatred that says thus it's reality. The Cubs are not an option for winning ball players. Just greedy half effort giving players

It will take time for that culture to change
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Put the kookaid down. If it's about winning I'm not sure where the Cubs would rank. 20-25 is probable.

Now if winning isn't important considering the money is close than the Cubs have a shot.

But I see Fielder as a winner unlike current Pena/Lee. And it's not my hatred that says thus it's reality. The Cubs are not an option for winning ball players. Just greedy half effort giving players

It will take time for that culture to change

Kerry Wood... so greedy... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
Put the kookaid down. If it's about winning I'm not sure where the Cubs would rank. 20-25 is probable.

Now if winning isn't important considering the money is close than the Cubs have a shot.

But I see Fielder as a winner unlike current Pena/Lee. And it's not my hatred that says thus it's reality. The Cubs are not an option for winning ball players. Just greedy half effort giving players

It will take time for that culture to change

Considering we will have a new GM, $50MM off the payroll, and probably a new manager, I really don't see how you can say that the Cubs won't be a winner going forward. Currently this team has no direction until we get a GM in place.
 

Top