Put the kookaid down. If it's about winning I'm not sure where the Cubs would rank. 20-25 is probable.
Now if winning isn't important considering the money is close than the Cubs have a shot.
But I see Fielder as a winner unlike current Pena/Lee. And it's not my hatred that says thus it's reality. The Cubs are not an option for winning ball players. Just greedy half effort giving players
It will take time for that culture to change
im not drinking kool aid...but dont you think making the generalization that the cubs are not an option for winning ball players, just greedy half effort giving players seems a little close minded as well as not considering the cubs have had rather recent success(08)...(i will agree some players on the cubs are a bit half assed..but i dont like the generalization)
you could make the argument that "the cubs did well in those years, but it did not correlate to playoff success...and that is what is most important.."
the problem with taking that side(not saying you did though) is that if we take that angle, then the point about prince fielder being a winner becomes moot. What exactly has he won in terms of postseason? You cant have a double standard
look, im not going to preach about how the cubs big market will reel fielder in..its certainly attractive as well as some of our young crop...but of course there's alot of work to do in terms of winning... i also think that fielder may consider winning to be important..but he may(or probably will) consider other factors..not to mention what is the specifics of what he is looking for in winning? winning now? winning later? a good environment,division for winning?
it is unquestionable, though, that fielder would have a profound positive impact for the cubs offense...you also have to wonder how the picking of the new GM will influence this sweepstakes....on a number of levels