This Is It: Official Blackhawks "Day Of" The Trade Deadline Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Eklund and John Jaeckel say Oduya to chicago...guess that means it is done
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Mark Spector:
"Quiet, quiet on #Flames front. No #Blackhawks interest in Shane O'Brien. #Habs Chris Campoli still makes sense to CHI for me. #SNtrade"
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
Mark Spector:
"Quiet, quiet on #Flames front. No #Blackhawks interest in Shane O'Brien. #Habs Chris Campoli still makes sense to CHI for me. #SNtrade"

Campoli again? Ehhhh.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
There was nothing wrong with Campoli...

why does everyone say ehhh?
 

Diehardfan

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 10, 2010
Posts:
9,605
Liked Posts:
6,993
Location:
Western Burbs
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
There was nothing wrong with Campoli...

why does everyone say ehhh?

Oh, they'd much rather hook their wagon up to Johnny Oduya. In his last 145 NHL games he's put up all of 55 points and is a -24.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
He's another soft player. We need a physical guy not another OFD.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Agreed, I actually think Campoli would be a nice #4/5 on this team. Brings a lot to the table.

and a puck mover which our PP desperately needs

but I guess I see where people are put off by his numbers
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
If Campoli is good, I don't think the Blackhawks would have left him go in the first place.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
They could've kept Campoli in the offseason..move on.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
If Campoli is good, I don't think the Blackhawks would have left him go in the first place.

he wanted too much and bowman at the time thought it was too much to pay...obviously desperate times call for more cap availability. lol
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
they have more cap now, so his salary isnt a problem now like it was in the offseason
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
If Campoli is good, I don't think the Blackhawks would have left him go in the first place.

Simply not true.

Campoli was asking for more money than he was worth, so that is why the Blackhawks let him go. Campoli found out the hard way that he wasn't worth as much as his agent was telling him.

Campoli is a solid player. I'd have no problem with a Campoli or a Spacek...both are underrated by the casual hockey fan.
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Simply not true.

Campoli was asking for more money than he was worth, so that is why the Blackhawks let him go. Campoli found out the hard way that he wasn't worth as much as his agent was telling him.

Campoli is a solid player. I'd have no problem with a Campoli or a Spacek...both are underrated by the casual hockey fan.




I don't think it's worth reacquiring someone over again. I'd rather try Spacek than Campoli again.
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
I don't think it's worth reacquiring someone over again. I'd rather try Spacek than Campoli again.

Blackhawks have had Spacek as well before...so I don't know what your point is.

Who cares if the Hawks would be "reacquiring" someone. Needs change and if Campoli helps (which I think he would) then by all means please go out and acquire him if the price is right.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
I'd be fine with Campoli. He played very well with Seabrook last year, and that could bump Keith with Leddy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top