- Joined:
- Jun 9, 2011
- Posts:
- 15,246
- Liked Posts:
- 7,973
- Location:
- Chicago
My favorite teams
**Before anyone rips their dick off - This is not a thread advocating that we should have kept either one of them. Just a random thought I had when discussing the situation with some friends.**
Looking at the Brian Flores situation - A lot of people (myself included) have praised the job he's done in Miami, despite finishing with a record 1 game below .500. Why is he being praised? Because he had a poorly assembled team and still found ways to win games.
Seems like the consensus with Bears fans is that Pace did a very bad job constructing this team. If that's true, then isn't the fact that Nagy finished with an overall record of 3 games above .500 and 2 playoff appearances also impressive?
On the flip side, if we were to agree that the Bears roster was solid and the Bears should have done more over the last 4 years than they did, then shouldn't we be complimenting Pace for assembling a talented team, but trashing Nagy for not optimizing said talent?
Yet, we as fans seem to talkin as they both did a bad job...
But it doesn't seem true to say both did an awful/bad job. When both the GM and HC do an awful job, the results are much, much worse than a record of 34-31 and two playoff appearances.
At worst, I think the fair thing to say about these two is that Pace assembled an average team and Nagy produced average results. Pace did some good things, but also did some bad things. Nagy went out there and performed at the level of the talent that he had.... Didn't make them much better, but also didn't make them much worse.
Looking back at it, I would say that at best, Ryan Pace did an average job. At worst, he did a poor job. At best, Nagy did a pretty good job, and at worst, did an average job.
I guess, overall what I'm trying to say is that Pace was at more fault than Nagy. I think if Nagy finds the right fit, he may be successful. That fit just wasn't with the Bears.
Looking at the Brian Flores situation - A lot of people (myself included) have praised the job he's done in Miami, despite finishing with a record 1 game below .500. Why is he being praised? Because he had a poorly assembled team and still found ways to win games.
Seems like the consensus with Bears fans is that Pace did a very bad job constructing this team. If that's true, then isn't the fact that Nagy finished with an overall record of 3 games above .500 and 2 playoff appearances also impressive?
On the flip side, if we were to agree that the Bears roster was solid and the Bears should have done more over the last 4 years than they did, then shouldn't we be complimenting Pace for assembling a talented team, but trashing Nagy for not optimizing said talent?
Yet, we as fans seem to talkin as they both did a bad job...
But it doesn't seem true to say both did an awful/bad job. When both the GM and HC do an awful job, the results are much, much worse than a record of 34-31 and two playoff appearances.
At worst, I think the fair thing to say about these two is that Pace assembled an average team and Nagy produced average results. Pace did some good things, but also did some bad things. Nagy went out there and performed at the level of the talent that he had.... Didn't make them much better, but also didn't make them much worse.
Looking back at it, I would say that at best, Ryan Pace did an average job. At worst, he did a poor job. At best, Nagy did a pretty good job, and at worst, did an average job.
I guess, overall what I'm trying to say is that Pace was at more fault than Nagy. I think if Nagy finds the right fit, he may be successful. That fit just wasn't with the Bears.