??? ?????? wrote:
I'm not buying Wilt's crap.
Three things about the NBA now vs. then.
1. No international players. Smaller pool of talent to choose from.
2. There was a lot more white players back then...
3. Players needed to have other jobs in the offseason, so they couldn't commit as much time to basketball.
I think what you mean by number 2 is that there was a essentially a cap on minorities on each team so all the talent was not in the league. MJ didn't face today's pool of international players, and more specific to his time neither did Kareem or Bill Russell but you consider them better players why?
Although I doubt any player's ability would translate 20 or 30 years later that, imo that is not a legitimate reason to say Wilt wasn't the best ever, if Shaq is second on your list for dominating guys with his mass and athleticism, simply before his time in these areas, why is it that Wilt doesn't get credit for dominating guys with his height, mass and athleticism before his time?
He is the most dominant player in the history of the 4 major team sports. This is a guy who had a double triple double, at least 20 in 3 stats, and multiple quadruple double-doubles, 40 in two stats. Really the only knock on him is that he didn't win more championships, is this the issue?