Diehardfan
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,601
- Liked Posts:
- 6,984
- Location:
- Western Burbs
My favorite teams
I think we're talking about two different things though. Obviously relievers are used more which is what you're suggesting. What I'm talking about more is in reference to the skyrocketing cost that has occurred in the past 5 years. From 2001-2011 reliever cost was fairly steady adjusted for inflation. The graph here is more about the growth of LOOGY's. In the 80's you'd have a reliever come in and he'd throw 2-3 innings commonly. This graph basically shows the idea that 1 out guys became a thing. The 2014 Royals to my knowledge were one of the first teams to have effectively 3 guys who could close in Davis, Holland and Herrera. All 3 had ERA's under 1.45. And in the playoffs they also brought up Brandon Finnegan who was fantastic. What made that bullpen special is their starter could get into a jam and at any point in the game you had 3-4 guys who could come in and fairly reliably get them out of that jam. Why that is revolutionary is historically if a starter got into a jam in say the 5th inning you'd see a middle reliever. Typically it was your "long guy." In other words, you're talking about guys like Travis Wood who are essentially our 6th starter. The idea was then for that guy to get you to the 7th where you'd see your specialization guys for the 7th-9th. Where we are today is a team like the cubs has Davis for the 9th but they can bring Edwards in at any point in the game. And presumably when Edwards gets you out of that jam you have someone like Duensing who's not a high leverage reliever start a clean frame. That in turn makes him more effective at his job because most relievers are decent with no one on to start an inning.
I think you're right, we are talking about two different things. Not exactly a first on the internet. LOL