- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 22,518
- Liked Posts:
- 7,550
- Location:
- Enemy Territory via southern C
Just send Strome to the Kraken?
Just send Strome to the Kraken?
If Toews comes back a God.
And Borg comes back a God.
And Dach comes back a God.
And Shalnov is a God.
Cat-Borg-Kane (infinite power line)
Reichel-Toews-Kubalik (200 foot line)
Suter-Dach-Shalynov (Dach line)
Kurashev-Kampf-Hagel (speed line)
Rasko in terms of the rebuild I also feel the same, I want to have high hopes, but the glaring issues on this team need to be dealt with immediately, and I have zero faith in our GM to get this done. It’s the same old story, until he is relieved of his duties or and or another GM takes over his role this team will be having more seasons like the one we just saw.We really should have rested Keith more and played Delia and Nalimov in competition throughout to learn more and tank properly.
What a lottery and what a draft coming, if they were going to hit bottom and move NTCs it was last year, collect picks in first 2 rounds, etc.
The defense is a clusterfuck, the forwards need beef that can win a face off and still the other left wing finisher they have searched for for years.
I don't have alot hope this can be rebuilt.
Next season should be a better guage of where we are.
You don't...unless you pay for it.Just look at that list, this goes back to what we were talking about in another post about Lankinen, how can you expect anymore from your goalie with a decor such as that.
You don't...unless you pay for it.
Our goalies are very green so you can't really be expecting them to put up decent numbers behind a shitty D. The only question mark is Subban. 82 games in and he's .899 on the career. Delia at 24 is .905 and Lankien at 37 is .909. None of those numbers are mind-blowing, however, 82 games in and Subban might be what he is. The ceiling might be higher for both Delia and Lankinen.
Plus, you gotta take the FWDs and their lack of D-prowess into consideration. Only a few are any good in that regard.
Plus, even on the D-side the 'hawks are not going to get a true top-4 D (or a top center who can win a draw, or a top playmaker who can reliably feed Debrincat) without paying for it. Again, think Brian Campbell's contract here the 1st time.
If Subban was on a good defensive team that cleared his MANY rebounds,he might be a legit backup........I just don't see a higher ceiling than that.......if that.Yeah, I think Subban is what he is. Third organization of his career, late 20's, still has glaring weaknesses (rebound control especially) that he's yet to improve.
I'd be fine with losing Subban and giving Delia a decent shot with Lank. Delia deserves it, been with the org for a while now. Unless he completely shits the bed in camp or something; then maybe bring in a cheap vet goalie (if only to push Lankinen by providing real competition and guidance).
I'd be okay with that, but like I said elsewhere barring a "we'll trade you xxx so you'll take yyy in expansion", I got a feeling one of Delia or Subban is gone in expansion--or Lankinen if Bowman is hitting the sauce and protects one of the other two netmindersYeah, I think Subban is what he is. Third organization of his career, late 20's, still has glaring weaknesses (rebound control especially) that he's yet to improve.
I'd be fine with losing Subban and giving Delia a decent shot with Lank. Delia deserves it, been with the org for a while now. Unless he completely shits the bed in camp or something; then maybe bring in a cheap vet goalie (if only to push Lankinen by providing real competition and guidance).
Agreed; and the problem is I think we're further behind on defense than anywhere else. Unless we bring in a ringer on a 1st go-around Campbell-like contract, our D will be playing catch-up for awhile. So that being said by the time the defense en masse (i.e. not one or two players, but everyone) is good enough to help a goalie like Subban be successful I think Subban, Delia, and Lankinen will all be considered vet netminders.If Subban was on a good defensive team that cleared his MANY rebounds,he might be a legit backup........I just don't see a higher ceiling than that.......if that.
Alot of mocks are speculating the Kraken are taking CDH, which I'm completely fine with.I would be shocked if the Kraken took either netminder
De Haan makes the most sense for them; and I'd be fine with losing him too.Alot of mocks are speculating the Kraken are taking CDH, which I'm completely fine with.
But what draft pick are we throwing their way for this to happen?
I don't see it. DeHaan is a $4M defender who's a liability in the backend. Unless the 'hawks sweeten the deal so Seattle takes him, There is virtually no reason to take him over just about everyone else that'll be exposed--including the guys needing a contract. The only possible reason I could see is if they needed to pad the cap-from-expansion number...and there are better players on other teams for that.De Haan makes the most sense for them; and I'd be fine with losing him too.