TexasBearfan
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,693
- Liked Posts:
- 2,537
"My reasoning on Trubisky is not based on his decent athleticism or his fantastic arm. It’s based on the most important statistic – the fact he didn’t win enough in his one year as North Carolina’s starter. "
:lmao:
"My reasoning on Trubisky is not based on his decent athleticism or his fantastic arm. It’s based on the most important statistic – the fact he didn’t win enough in his one year as North Carolina’s starter. "
:lmao:
"My reasoning on Trubisky is not based on his decent athleticism or his fantastic arm. It’s based on the most important statistic – the fact he didn’t win enough in his one year as North Carolina’s starter. "
:lmao:
This is the same guy who said "THE BEARS WILL NOT BEAT THE RAVENS."
The basketball was always doing just fine and didn't need a turn aroundWhy didn't Peppers turn the UNC program around?
The basketball was always doing just fine and didn't need a turn around
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I'm not sure he understands this but we don't need him to be everything, Watson has lost games when he threw for 5 touchdowns, so clearly that's not everything. I just want the biscuit to make good decisions, improve and learn from his mistakes. We have lightning and thunder, we have a really good D, we don't need Trubs to carry the team. I would be ecstatic if he was tearing up the league, don't get me wrong, but he doesn't have to and that's perfectly fine. If Watson was here the coaching staff would be doing the same thing to him too.
"My reasoning on Trubisky is not based on his decent athleticism or his fantastic arm. It’s based on the most important statistic – the fact he didn’t win enough in his one year as North Carolina’s starter. "
Poor Scott....smh