Using Your Head.

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,886
Liked Posts:
26,376
I have never seen it before ever lol. Don't usually see a puck getting up that high infront of a clogged crease that's probably why.

I really enjoyed it all. Was like a corner kick.

Paul Kariya scored off his face against the Blackhawks when he was on the Blues.
 

BlackHawkPaul

Fartbarf
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2010
Posts:
5,997
Liked Posts:
2,338
Location:
Somewhere in Indiana
I really wanted that puck to touch a Duck player before going into the net.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
CFbLAWiWEAAqFFU.png

Yeah the problem with that rule is it is never enforced. I have players redirect with their skate, I have seen them do a snow job and deflect it with their skates, both were pretty damn on purpose and both times goals counted. Under that rule they would not have counted. It is a EXTREMELY poorly written rule and all the subsections under cover disallowed goals a lot better than that one and are specific.
 

Adun

Member
Joined:
Aug 25, 2012
Posts:
291
Liked Posts:
64
Yeah the problem with that rule is it is never enforced. I have players redirect with their skate, I have seen them do a snow job and deflect it with their skates, both were pretty damn on purpose and both times goals counted. Under that rule they would not have counted. It is a EXTREMELY poorly written rule and all the subsections under cover disallowed goals a lot better than that one and are specific.

Hell, their first goal should have been disallowed going by this rule
 

TCD

New member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2014
Posts:
3,339
Liked Posts:
1,597
Yeah the problem with that rule is it is never enforced. I have players redirect with their skate, I have seen them do a snow job and deflect it with their skates, both were pretty damn on purpose and both times goals counted. Under that rule they would not have counted. It is a EXTREMELY poorly written rule and all the subsections under cover disallowed goals a lot better than that one and are specific.

There are a bunch of sub clauses in the rule book about pucks off the skates. You can't take that posted rule and apply it to pucks off the skates without looking at all the little sub clauses about those type of puck off skates goals.
 

ClydeLee

New member
Joined:
Jun 29, 2010
Posts:
14,829
Liked Posts:
4,113
Location:
The OP
The puck off the skate qualifiers don't change anything. They don't say it's okay to deflect off the skate except with a distinct kicking motion. It basically just jumps into it like that rule. Going to, the goal will be disallowed if its off a skate with a distinct kicking motion.

It's just badly worded because DIRECTING sounds like it could apply to any passive act where you position yourself to have the puck bounce in off you, but that's not what they mean or enforce.

I should be made clearer but it's the NHL and rules ... so that won't change anytime soon.
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Personally, I think the rule is fine. You shouldn't be able to intentionally use anything other than your stick to put the puck in the net.
 

TCD

New member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2014
Posts:
3,339
Liked Posts:
1,597
Personally, I think the rule is fine. You shouldn't be able to intentionally use anything other than your stick to put the puck in the net.

Yah pretty much agree. Not sure what the big deal is. The entire game is based on a puck and a stick!!! Once the rules change to being able to put a puck in with any body part then it's not hockey anymore its some other weird fucking game.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
There are a bunch of sub clauses in the rule book about pucks off the skates. You can't take that posted rule and apply it to pucks off the skates without looking at all the little sub clauses about those type of puck off skates goals.

But those are sub rules to the main rule not sub rules of the rule in question therefore are in direct conflict and of equal importance of that rule
 

Adun

Member
Joined:
Aug 25, 2012
Posts:
291
Liked Posts:
64
If they let players grab the puck out of the air, then they should let them head the puck in goal. His only other option is to grab it, put it down and shoot it. That's too much work in that tight space and it's not gonna work
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Really I think Shaw's lucky someone wasn't trying to play the puck with a stick at the same time and accidentally caught him in the face instead
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,676
Liked Posts:
3,046
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
If they let players grab the puck out of the air, then they should let them head the puck in goal. His only other option is to grab it, put it down and shoot it. That's too much work in that tight space and it's not gonna work
They can't grab the puck out of the air and put it into the goal, though.

Honestly, the heabutt and the fact that it was above the corssbar was enough for it to get waived off, but Pele would have been proud.

That whole play should be the old, "History will be made" videos they did in what, 2010?
 

Adun

Member
Joined:
Aug 25, 2012
Posts:
291
Liked Posts:
64
They can't grab the puck out of the air and put it into the goal, though.

Honestly, the heabutt and the fact that it was above the corssbar was enough for it to get waived off, but Pele would have been proud.

That whole play should be the old, "History will be made" videos they did in what, 2010?

I wasn't talking about putting it in goal, just the fact that you're allowed to grab the puck in general. You can't toss a pass or clear the zone over someone's head cause he's gonna grab it. I'd rather let them highstick it then play it with the hands
 

Tater

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
13,392
Liked Posts:
5,207
The rule is fine. It was entertaining. The Hawks won.
Don't kick in goals. Don't head butt them in.
Don't swat it in with your junk.


What if while in the crease you're all :fap:
 

LordKOTL

Scratched for Vorobiev
Joined:
Dec 8, 2014
Posts:
8,676
Liked Posts:
3,046
Location:
PacNW
My favorite teams
  1. Portland Timbers
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I wasn't talking about putting it in goal, just the fact that you're allowed to grab the puck in general. You can't toss a pass or clear the zone over someone's head cause he's gonna grab it. I'd rather let them highstick it then play it with the hands
Technically, you can't--but the closing your hand on the puck is about as enforced as travelling in basketball--only the bottom feeder players draw it. The rule as I know it says that you can bat the puck down with your hand (or handpass in your own defensive zone), but you can't grab it--and certainbly can't carry it or close your hand on it if it's on the ice. You can kick or headbut (if you so desire) the puck to any other teammate (or yourself) anywehre on the ice--except into the net.

I just don't see how grabbing the puck equates to allowing a header as a goal. The rule as I know it states that only the stick can dynamically propel the puck into the net--any other defelction has to be completely passive--you can control the angle of the carom but you can't add any force behind it.
 

Top