Pegger
President Stoopid
- Joined:
- Sep 18, 2012
- Posts:
- 7,621
- Liked Posts:
- 5,873
- Location:
- Communist Canada
I get why you are frustrated. You were trying to make one point and what came out just confused the message you were trying to send.You can go fuck yourself too. My comment had nothing to do with anything of the sort. Funny how you can admonish people for not reading the "full report" when you cant bother to read two sentences.
To refresh your memory..................
And while I am sure there is a lot more to the story than that one text message exchange
Try harder moron.
No need to go on the attack with "fuck yourself" or "moron". Just shrug, say you fucked up a bit and move forward. I'm sure all posters have fucked up before, so the audience will be fairly accommodating. I know every time I've said I was wrong it's been received fairly well.
To focus on your last line. There absolutely is a lot more to the story that just one text exchange. That's why I did my little recap, which you may not have read. I do take time to ensure my formatting makes it easier to read. Please do give it a read and let me know your thoughts after gathering that info. I'm not asking you or anyone to subscribe to the Washington Post or read a lengthy article. Just read the brief and tell me if that changes the opinion I've heard of 'only 5% of harassed women are actually harassed'.
That's really what I was trying to debunk. Overall as a society we've gotten pretty lazy (or maybe technology has made our laziness harder to hide). It's so much easier to see a big structural problem and look for reasons why we shouldn't do anything. In this situation the Washington Post did some genuine journalism. They identified a problem, put in a lot of work in, verified their sources and made their findings easy to digest. With that being said it's a pay site, so many will use that as a reason not to learn about this specific issue.