Don't have to be in my head, you were clearly talking about the legal aspect as shown here:
"This really doesn't address anything as the question that arose is not whether the lawyer should press for charges but why none of these 21 women filed charges. If it were one or two women you could understand that but the issue is how likely is it that 21 different women can be assaulted and none of them had the indignation of that assault override whatever concerns they had to file a criminal complaint.
Think of it this way, the large the sample size gets, the more likely it should be statistically that one of these women would have filed a police report. If for example police reports are filed in only 10% of sexual assault cases then 3 allegations means 0.3 should a police report. As that is less than one person it is not statistically unusual for none of them to have reported. But in 21 cases then 2.1 of them should have filed a police report so the fact 0 did is a bit of an anomaly."
You can't file a criminal complaint if the offense is a misdemeanor.
Look, I am not defending Watson here, I am only explaining why many of the women might not have bothered to file charges, making your argument asking why of the 21 women, none of them filed charges moot. Your also failing to take into account these women were paid for their services, (an I am not claiming that makes any of this right), and to file charges against a client might harm their reputation, so it's not as clear cut as your example makes it out to be.