- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,198
- Liked Posts:
- 2,308
- Location:
- Cyberspace, USA
As the Shoopster might say, "Ah, the irony ..."
What the hell?!?!? (google message)
- Thread starter Tater
- Start date
As the Shoopster might say, "Ah, the irony ..."
- Joined:
- Jan 4, 2011
- Posts:
- 48,043
- Liked Posts:
- 36,973
- Location:
- Chicago
I thought google was made for porn?
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 34,249
- Liked Posts:
- 26,378
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
I'm pretty sure I always do, but I want to know what images on the site provoked this. It's not like hardcore porn was getting posted on a daily basis.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 34,249
- Liked Posts:
- 26,378
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
It may not have been made for porn, but it definitely gives the best results.
- Joined:
- Jun 19, 2011
- Posts:
- 9,943
- Liked Posts:
- 3,898
There is "provoking barely dressed" stuff going on in music videos, movies and advertising that young kids watch and shit ... I still can't believe it.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,793
- Liked Posts:
- 11,553
Not sure if you are referring to me here, but I do not search the internet discreetly at work. I do it right out in the open, as does everybody else on the trading floor, sports sites and other things like that, it is totally fine. The problem comes in when there is what you referred to as a provocative image on the screen. I am not upset with that, I am fine with that, but it puts the company at risk that someone will sue the company for this, and this does happen in real life all the time. That is why companies have a stance that this is grounds for dismissal.
Really not so sure what is so hard to understand about this. I guess blocking images would be a potential fix for this for me at work. Although by the same token, I think it is really odd that there are people on here that have a problem with not posting sexually oriented pictures on a Bears website. Kind of weird to me.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 19,159
- Liked Posts:
- 12,239
Looked at page 1 and 16. This thread sucks. Can I post sucks or F... ?
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 37,894
- Liked Posts:
- 41,321
Same here. Completely fine to look at a sports site - if you're doing your job and can manage your work, not an issue. But scrolling past a shaking ass can be a problem if someone complains. There are also some posters who post at home with kids around who are going to notice giant gifs of bouncing tits. Text is fine, but the pics are unnecessary.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 34,249
- Liked Posts:
- 26,378
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
No, wasn't referring to you specifically, just referring to people who are surfing the web at work in general. You're on the internet, at work. You're already putting the company and your job at risk just by browsing. Kind of weird to me anyone would complain about someone posting NSFW images when you're, you know, at work, not being productive. Maybe it's because I've never had a job that allows me to even look at my phone on my downtime.
- Joined:
- Jun 19, 2011
- Posts:
- 32,905
- Liked Posts:
- 26,050
LMFAO haahaha
- Joined:
- Jun 19, 2011
- Posts:
- 32,905
- Liked Posts:
- 26,050
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 34,249
- Liked Posts:
- 26,378
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
Then turn them off. Problem solved. I mean, those types of pics/gifs don't show up in a thread where you really need pics on to begin with.
TheWinman
2020 CCS Survivor Fantasy Football Champion
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 7,069
- Liked Posts:
- 3,226
- Location:
- Ann Arbor, MI
My favorite teams
I now have this filling the top half of this website in a big yellow box, anyone know why the hell it's there? Edit: Nevermind, I was able to colse it out. Still wondering why it popped up there though. It's was only on the site.
- Google policy for adult/borderline adult images.
We ask you not to post any content within these bullet points sent to us from Google in the open areas of the site(which include visitor messages, profile images, avatars, postings, and signatures). You can use the Donator's area. Replace your avatars, signatures, group photos, and police your own posts that violate the following guidelines.
Not safe for work/school content will be removed. If you want to test us and see our limits with silly pictures and posts, it will get deleted and just like violating the rules, posting/pushing limits can and will get you banned. We're not on 24/7 to clean the site. If we can't trust you to behave on your own without getting the site in trouble with our sponsors, then we have no choice but to suspend, ban, or delete your account. We're sorry to be so blunt, but there are some users that are persistent in wanting to stir trouble.
- Strategically covered nudity.
- Sheer or see-through clothing
- Lewd or provocative poses.
- Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches
Thank you, and if you haven't been an issue, then no worries.
It's pretty fucking self explanatory
- Joined:
- Jun 19, 2011
- Posts:
- 32,905
- Liked Posts:
- 26,050
Cause this is where we hang out and sometimes a well placed crude gif is fucking hilarious. And sometimes its just fun in general. You don't have kids around, why are you cunting? Parents that have problems with this site can speak for themselves.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,793
- Liked Posts:
- 11,553
Yeah, everybody has different types of jobs. I get paid to make my bank money. If I make the bank money, they are happy and I get paid. Our compliance department is also fine with it, and I have friends in compliance that send me links with Bears and other stuff all the time.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 37,894
- Liked Posts:
- 41,321
Policies like these aren't about catering to individuals. Work, kids at home, there are plenty of circumstances where someone may not want to see that. There's a forum for it which I know you have access to. There are hundreds of T&A pics in there. That isn't enough? How many do you need on a football discussion board?
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 34,249
- Liked Posts:
- 26,378
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
Except you're still at work, and you're taking that risk by browsing the interwebz. Sounds to me like some of you guys are looking to place the blame for the possibility of getting you in trouble.
- Joined:
- Aug 31, 2014
- Posts:
- 16,835
- Liked Posts:
- 9,904
- Location:
- Socialist Republic of California
My favorite teams
Read 16 pages of this shit and am FUCKING exhausted. I realize Googles point is no one should post pictures of COCKS, BALLS, PUSSY, or any ANAL sex but any COCKSUCKING word I want to use is perfectly ok. So I ask....what is more rude..........a picture of a perfectly formed female ASS or the words I am saying in this post? And this coming from Google.....the purveyors of free speech? Sounds kind of like the new internet Hitler is beginning to put their foot down.
Get real
Get real
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 37,894
- Liked Posts:
- 41,321
Coming here isn't browsing the interwebz, it's a familiar site that's supposed to be about sports.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 17,667
- Liked Posts:
- 11,858
- Location:
- wv
Conform
Staff online NOW
-
BigfootCCS Enforcer