Chad_Thomas89
BANNED
- Joined:
- Aug 24, 2012
- Posts:
- 2,226
- Liked Posts:
- 759
- Location:
- Lake Station, IN
Not seeing your point but ok.I thought so
Not seeing your point but ok.I thought so
Don't get mad at me. I'm but a messenger. If you have complaints you can direct them to Rush and Zack.
Weren't you the one posting nasty manly pics of Gwen Stefani in this same forum?
Well what a shocker. We're asked to refrain from posting childish nonsense and porn on the board, and Nick and Xero want to openly disobey the rules and ruin it for everyone.
Nick, you add nothing to this board of substance. All you do is post gifs. And you aren't funny. Like, at all.
Xero, all you seem to do is engage in nasty personal attacks towards anyone you don't like, which seems to be about 90% of the board.
If y'all don't like the rules, why don't you stick to your chatroom clique and leave the main forum for those of us who wish to actually discuss football without wading through childish insults and porn?
Why would I donate now?
Special person gotta Special person I suppose. I haven't broken any rules and I shouldn't have to point out sarcasm. If you, biff, sunbiz, FT, rory, remy, airtime and the rest of your ball licking crew make up 90% of the forum then so be it. You're all idiots.
I posted a non-sexual pic of a fully clothed Gwen Stefani. That isn't against the rules.
You posted a non related bears image and made comments towards women in that same thread. I would put that under "childish nonsense".I posted a non-sexual pic of a fully clothed Gwen Stefani. That isn't against the rules.
You posted a non related bears image and made comments towards women in that same thread. I would put that under "childish nonsense".
loli suppose someone who is too stupid to understand the difference between constitutional regulation of government censorship and the rules of a private entity shouldn't be expected to read very much, but if you get a chance, try to read the message in question and you'll understand why my pic was ok and porn is not.
I suppose someone who is too stupid to understand the difference between constitutional regulation of government censorship and the rules of a private entity shouldn't be expected to read very much, but if you get a chance, try to read the message in question and you'll understand why my pic was ok and porn is not.
Can't remember the last time I posted porn in any thread whatsoever.
Seems like someones brekkie got pissed on again.
Thanks for popping by Mick, I'll be sure to keep up the good work so you have something to complain and wage war about on a message board for the coming months.