What Would You Like To See?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Hawks dont really need editing..

Savoir's articles are easily the best on this site and free of mistakes
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,412
Liked Posts:
28,513
Hawks dont really need editing..

Savoir's articles are easily the best on this site and free of mistakes

Cant hurt to have someone look anyways.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Very true.....

I guess I can do the Hawks forum
 

EnjoyYourTiger

That weird bear thing.
Donator
Joined:
May 6, 2010
Posts:
3,945
Liked Posts:
935
Location:
peoria/ chicago, il
what are you :serbia: about?

I will be a :serbia: editor dero.

Get the :serbia: out of here

DoYouSpeakEnglish.gif
 

Unitedcenterfans

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 23, 2010
Posts:
34
Liked Posts:
7
Location:
Chicago
I was thinking of all the teams not just the Hawks. Even though they are the best team in town!
 

waldo7239117

Driving Wreckless DA Best
Donator
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
11,225
Liked Posts:
788
No, it's like this. The Serbia blanks:

1) Talking.
2) Awesome.
3) ****.

IDK, I just messing around.
 

derosabomb

Joecawks is a dope
Donator
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
9,066
Liked Posts:
3,630
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
No, it's like this. The Serbia blanks:

1) Talking.
2) Awesome.
3) ****.

IDK, I just messing around.

aww waldo is trying to use his braiz, its so cute. Keep it up little buddy.

:marshmallow::elephant:
 
Last edited:

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Last edited by a moderator:

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
oh cmon...i thought we got past that already
 

USCChiFan

Crow's Nest
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
8,003
Liked Posts:
1,105
Location:
Behind you
TBO... for your overuse and odd use of the serbia smiley flag, it will be removed immediately :smug2:
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,412
Liked Posts:
28,513
So whats the verdict on editors?
 

Rush

**** it, Go Deep
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
13,285
Liked Posts:
7,400
Location:
North Carolina
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Carolina Hurricanes
  1. Duke Blue Devils
I don't want to have editors just for one team. It's either they will have to edit all articles, or none at all. I don't want to spread it out and make it into something more than it should be.

Also if we did have an editor, they would just edit on the whim. We wouldn't submit articles and have to wait for them. If anything at all, they would just edit it afterward.

Really, besides BigP, I don't see much need for an editor anywho. Most of the writers have grammatically improved to the point where it isn't needed. I've even seen BigP improve.

I could be wrong, but if you can give me specific examples, I'll gladly eat my words :D
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,412
Liked Posts:
28,513
I don't want to have editors just for one team. It's either they will have to edit all articles, or none at all. I don't want to spread it out and make it into something more than it should be.

Also if we did have an editor, they would just edit on the whim. We wouldn't submit articles and have to wait for them. If anything at all, they would just edit it afterward.

Really, besides BigP, I don't see much need for an editor anywho. Most of the writers have grammatically improved to the point where it isn't needed. I've even seen BigP improve.

I could be wrong, but if you can give me specific examples, I'll gladly eat my words :D

Thats cool...my only suggestion would be that in that people can point out fixes or mistakes in the comment section (and then those fixes be made). Or find someone who's willing to be editor for all articles.

I will say, most articles are fine. I have a tendency to fact-check various articles..ones I have read here, havent come across anything like that though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top