who would you like to see traded

pinkizdead

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
my vote is kirk hinrich. he's a good player, but we aren't using him adequately. we need a scorer, not a defender. i'd trade him for an expiring and a low draft pick. if you want a great defender, lets get tony allen this off season for 400K. Honestly i'd rather have a (low) draft pick and cap relief.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
I'd like to trade Kirk and Deng. Deng has been good so far this season but we can't have his contract and be a contender while being handicapped by the LT. By moving Deng's deal for an expiring, we can also bring in 2 max deals if salmons opts out or kirk is dealt. I'd love to bring in Josh Howard, Mike Miller or Bell as one of the expiring deals. All of them are injured now and will have to be dealt closer to the trade deadline. But they can all spread the floor.
 

vhans5219

New member
Joined:
Mar 28, 2009
Posts:
250
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Chicago IL
But who's gonna take Deng's contract ?
 
Diddy1122

Diddy1122

I ain't your pal dickface
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
4,459
Liked Posts:
1,155
Location:
Chicago
vhans5219 wrote:
I'd say tyrus thomas
Click to expand...

Agreed. But I'd trade anyone except Rose & Noah.
 

JimmyBulls

New member
Joined:
Apr 3, 2009
Posts:
491
Liked Posts:
0
The only trade I'm interested in seeing has to be a simple deal where Pargo is dealt for a second round pick. By making that deal the Bulls could then sign two D-Leaguers(PG & SG) for the rest of the season.

The Hornets could be a team that gets suckered into that type of trade.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
vhans5219 wrote:
But who's gonna take Deng's contract ?
Click to expand...

He's playing well of late, we might be able to get Portland to do it. Something like Blake, Outlaw and Howard for Deng.
 
pinkizdead

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
i think a lot of people are liking deng right now. i hope deng plays ridiculously well, so we can trade him for a high draft pick. my dream is that deng averages 20/10 this year, so we can trick the pacers to trade him and a draft pick for danny granger.

part of the problem right now is there is no spacing on the floor. Teams wont guard our team on the perimeter, if we only have 1 decent shooter on the floor. Rose and deng seem like a bad combo until either, we get a 3 pt shooting big man or if rose/deng will develop a 3.
 
clonetrooper264

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,600
Liked Posts:
7,413
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I think I speak for 90% of the board by saying Hinrich. I speak for another 7% by saying Tyrus. Done.
 
pinkizdead

pinkizdead

New member
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
3,692
Liked Posts:
131
Location:
south loop
this may sound crazy but how bout deng for kevin martin?
they make about the same salary. we could move salmons down to the 3, and have a great 3 man guard rotation with rose, hinrich, and martin. salmons/martin/ johnson, we could have a nice lineup

we'd loose a lot defensively. A LOT, but we'd get a nice offensive player. it might take the pressure off rose and hinrich and salmons. However he isnt a great 3 point shooter, but man is he efficient.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
pinkizdead wrote:
this may sound crazy but how bout deng for kevin martin?
they make about the same salary. we could move salmons down to the 3, and have a great 3 man guard rotation with rose, hinrich, and martin. salmons/martin/ johnson, we could have a nice lineup

we'd loose a lot defensively. A LOT, but we'd get a nice offensive player. it might take the pressure off rose and hinrich and salmons. However he isnt a great 3 point shooter, but man is he efficient.
Click to expand...

Sacto laughs and laughs and laughs. Not going to happen.
 

??? ??????

New member
Joined:
Apr 2, 2009
Posts:
2,435
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Columbia, MO
Everyone except Joakim Noah has to be open for shopping. (And even Noah isn't untouchable...but not a guy you actively want to lose, just a guy you trade if you get an offer you can't refuse).
 

Shakes

Iconoclast
Joined:
Apr 22, 2009
Posts:
3,857
Liked Posts:
142
People will probably hate the idea, but I'd love to trade Rose while he still has "potential superstar" value, if he finishes the season averaging 15/5 with 3 TO and 50% TS I think our chances will be gone to get any value for him.
 

??? ??????

New member
Joined:
Apr 2, 2009
Posts:
2,435
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Columbia, MO
Shakes wrote:
People will probably hate the idea, but I'd love to trade Rose while he still has "potential superstar" value, if he finishes the season averaging 15/5 with 3 TO and 50% TS I think our chances will be gone to get any value for him.
Click to expand...

We should have traded Rose this summer, and then re-signed Ben Gordon imo. That wasn't quite my opinion in the offseason (which was keep Rose, re-sign Gordon), but it is becoming somewhat clear that is the right idea.

Although I would have to wonder what the team would look like if we had re-signed Ben Gordon and used the MLE on Charlie Villanueva (LOL at the idea of JR using the MLE to improve our team, while pushing us even deeper in to the luxury tax).

Then we would have had:

PG-Derrick Rose/Kirk Hinrich
SG-Ben Gordon/John Salmons/Kirk Hinrich
SF-Luol Deng/John Salmons
PF-Charlie Villanueva/Tyrus Thomas
C- Joakim Noah/Brad Miller

We would have had a big front court, and plenty of depth. We would have had Brad Miller, Tyrus Thomas, Jerome James' expiring contracts to leverage at the trade deadline to add more talent to our team.
 
houheffna

houheffna

Ignoring Idiots
Joined:
May 6, 2009
Posts:
8,673
Liked Posts:
2,711
We should have traded Rose this summer, and then re-signed Ben Gordon imo. That wasn't quite my opinion in the offseason (which was keep Rose, re-sign Gordon), but it is becoming somewhat clear that is the right idea.
Click to expand...

Uhhhh, that is not clear to anybody else but you that keeping Gordon over Rose is a good idea. I think Gordon would be surprised if the Bulls made such an idiotic move as that.
 

??? ??????

New member
Joined:
Apr 2, 2009
Posts:
2,435
Liked Posts:
4
Location:
Columbia, MO
houheffna wrote:
We should have traded Rose this summer, and then re-signed Ben Gordon imo. That wasn't quite my opinion in the offseason (which was keep Rose, re-sign Gordon), but it is becoming somewhat clear that is the right idea.
Click to expand...

Uhhhh, that is not clear to anybody else but you that keeping Gordon over Rose is a good idea. I think Gordon would be surprised if the Bulls made such an idiotic move as that.
Click to expand...

Bulls could have kept Gordon, and then sent Rose along with some crap for Chris Bosh, and then added another player with the MLE. I'm sure they'd be looking a lot better now if they had done that, than they do now.
 

TheStig

New member
Joined:
Apr 5, 2009
Posts:
3,636
Liked Posts:
38
While I don't agree with trading Rose. We could have conceivable had our 2010 this summer if we resigned BG and completed the boozer trade we held up. We would have had a team in the LT but with the same cap number next year.

Rose/Pargo/Hunter
BG/Salmons/Pargo
Deng/Salmons/JJ
Boozer/Taj/JJ
Noah/Miller

With the way BG, Deng, Boozer and Noah have all played to start the season, we would definitely be a top team in the league.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

10,925members
95,492threads
4,522,826posts
340online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 340 (members: 8, guests: 332)
Top