Who would you Rather PLay against in WCF

[Sid.Luckman]

Kings, the Ducks have more depth, speed, and their goalie is a grown man in net.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

[nwfisch]

I'm sure a lot of people would want to reconsider.

 

[hyatt151]

Crawford this postseason: 12 GP, .931 SA%, 1.97 GAA

Quick this postseason: 13 GP, .914 SA%, 2.78 GAA

Yeah, not worried about the Kings at all. And the Ducks with a rookie goalie?

:andruw:

Excuse me while I clear my calendar for the first two weeks of June.

OOPS! :admin:

 

[DMelt36]

OOPS! :admin:

Series ain't over yet.

 

[JZsportsfan]

Sharks shouldn't have fucked up and let these guys back from 0-3

 

[DMelt36]

Revisionist history attempts are pointless.

Who's to say Gibson wouldn't have stonewalled the Hawks this series?

Based on the Hawks dominance of the Kings up until this series, I would've preferred the Kings top the Ducks in that series every single time.

 

[Diehardfan]

Revisionist history attempts are pointless.

Who's to say Gibson wouldn't have stonewalled the Hawks this series?

Based on the Hawks dominance of the Kings up until this series, I would've preferred the Kings top the Ducks in that series every single time.

I also wanted the Kings but for different reasons. The Hawks for the first time in a long time had a losing road record. Wait, before you get your panties in a bunch and say...No they didn't!!! The only reason it looks that way was because of OTL's. They did get themselves a point in those games but invariably ending up losing most of them in OT or Shoot-out. I wanted home ice, I felt it was important this year and I also felt that Quick is a bit over rated as a goalie.

 

[nwfisch]

My money was on the Ducks. Oh well.

 

[DMelt36]

Revisionist history attempts are pointless.

Who's to say Gibson wouldn't have stonewalled the Hawks this series?

Based on the Hawks dominance of the Kings up until this series, I would've preferred the Kings top the Ducks in that series every single time.

Standing by this.