pinkizdead
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,692
- Liked Posts:
- 131
- Location:
- south loop
RIGHT now i think you could make the argument that rose is as good as kobe.
RIGHT now i think you could make the argument that rose is as good as kobe.
Rose for Kobe is just plain crazy. Kobe has a year or two left of prime basketball. Rose is 10 years younger than him...nothing to talk about there. If Kobe was 22...that is quite different, but too much tread on those tires....forget it.
Even when I disregard my emotion/homerism, I wouldnt trade him for anyone. I truly believe that Rose has a ceiling high enough to be the best in the NBA. Better than Durant, better than Dwight, better than Lebron.
I see Kobe taking the Bulls to the Finals MORE in 2 years than Rose could in 12. I'd do it in a heartbeat.
What if Rose signs with the Lakers or the Knicks when he's an unrestricted? What if he only has 5 or 6 good years, gets hurt and is Penny Hardaway?
I see Kobe taking the Bulls to the Finals MORE in 2 years than Rose could in 12. I'd do it in a heartbeat.
What if Rose signs with the Lakers or the Knicks when he's an unrestricted? What if he only has 5 or 6 good years, gets hurt and is Penny Hardaway?
Kobe is closer to getting hurt badly than Rose...no way would ANY GM make the move you are talking about...its a bad, bad move.
what if kobe knee's crap out on him after years of use.
This guy would!
Did you really just say acquiring Kobe Bryant would be "a bad, bad move?"
Did you just have a Freudian slip that Kobe Bryant ISN'T as good as Jordan there? Even in '97, teams would have lined up around the block if they could acquire Michael Jordan.
Serious question - do you believe Derrick Rose will finish with MORE titles than Kobe Bryant will win the REMAINDER of his career?
I'll give you he has a LOT more mileage on those legs. But I actually think the Bulls would be better with Kobe than the Lakers would be with Rose.