Why is baseball discussion revolve around acronyms?

Status
Not open for further replies.

poodski

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
3,276
Liked Posts:
680
Yikes this thread just goes in weird trends.

Anyhow IMO marmol shouldn't be the closer.

He shouldn't be the setup man.

He should simply be used as the stopper and by stopper I mean he should be used in important situations wether that situation be the sixth inning with the bases loaded or to start the ninth. It's incredibly stupid to say out best reliever will be used as X and only as X.

That's just my opinion on this subject.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
poodski brings up logical and sensible points.
 

AddisonStation

YamaHama it's fright nite
Donator
Joined:
Nov 30, 2010
Posts:
1,613
Liked Posts:
434
Location:
Rocky Top
Yikes this thread just goes in weird trends.

Anyhow IMO marmol shouldn't be the closer.

He shouldn't be the setup man.

He should simply be used as the stopper and by stopper I mean he should be used in important situations wether that situation be the sixth inning with the bases loaded or to start the ninth. It's incredibly stupid to say out best reliever will be used as X and only as X.

That's just my opinion on this subject.

This is pretty much what I meant... but you know that he will be used as only a closer.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
stick to the subject, I created a thread for cubs general talk for a reason. use it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top