Why signing Kirk Hinrich makes sense

ChicagoDawg1991

Guest
"I'm baaaaaaaaaaaaaack" as Michael Jordan once said when he came out of retirement prior to the 1994-95 season to give the Bulls an extra push for a playoff spot. That was 17 years ago when 'The Greatest Of All Time' returned to the hardwood courts

Now 17 years later, could those be the words that come out of Kirk Hinrich? Bulls Insider Aggrey Sam of Comcast Sports Net-Chicago recently wrote an article of Captain Kirk potentially being the interim replacement starting Point Guard in place of Derrick Rose.

The article said quote "Help wanted: Veteran point guard, capable of starting, but comfortable coming off the bench when All-Star point guard returns from injury late in season. Must be willing to play for defensive-minded coach, familiarity with Bulls organization and Chicago area is a plus. Salary negotiable, but hometown discounts appreciated! Scouring a list of available free-agent point guards over the next few months will inevitably occur, but one player in particular fits the above description: Kirk Hinrich"

As we all know, he was drafted 7th overall out of Kansas despite being labeled a mid to late first rounder by the Bulls in 2003 after Jay Williams suffered a career ending injury in a motorcycle accident. At that time, the Bulls were just coming out of their rebuilding stage with guys like Eddy Curry, Tyson Chandler but they had nothing else until the 2004 offseason when Ben Gordon, Luol Deng and Chris Duhon were acquired on Draft Day.

Many fans questioned about his abilities to be a starter in the NBA and boy did those fans turn into believers after seeing the intense defense, the solid perimeter shooting, leadership of an experience veteran and creating crafty plays which led to him being selected to the All-Rookie 1st Team. In 2007 for his intensity, he was named to the 2nd All-Defensive Team.

While he wasn't the top scoring point guard in the league, his play alone made the Bulls better but when he got more help, the whole team slowly but surely got better and better. After a thumb injury and surgery, Derrick Rose was picked 1st Overall in 2008 which named him to the backup PG spot but minor injuries limited him to 51 games(4 starts) but was effective in an epic 7 game 1st round series with the defending champion Boston Celtics scoring over 12 points per game and playing really strong defense.

2009-10 was the last year for #12 in Bulls red scoring 11 PPG in 33 MPG in 53 starts and losing to Cleveland in 5 in the first round and we thought his Bull days were over.

Oh really? Well not if these injuries have to say something about it. The biggest question is will he be willing to take a paycut from his current $8 Million salary as part of that deal in 2006. If he was given $8 Million for multiple years i'm all for bringing back the Captain in Bull red, white and black.

I can give 5 very good reasons why Gar Forman our General Manager should consider bringing him back to the Chicago Bulls

1-He's a leader. They didn't name him the Team Captain for 4 straight years for nothing! Definitely would help some of the younger players coming in

2-A fan favorite! Sure this may not come in handy but still the people want to win and have someone who is familiar in a fill in role and hes been there before so I say DO IT!

3-Can play both Point and Shooting. We have a few swingmen already in Korver, Brewer and Butler but none of them can play the point and score everywhere and slash anywhere like Kirk can!

4-He has played with the Derrick and Luol. After all, him and Rose were the point guards for 2 seasons and Luol Deng was a starter alongside him from the 2004-05 til the 2009-10 season!

and the best for last
5-DEFENSE! His style and play on defense that he would bring to Coach Thibodeau's schemes would absolutely make the 2010-11 Coach Of The Year smile and happy each and every game!

If those aren't good reasons why Forman should bring him back, then I don't know what will! One thing is for certain, if they do pursue him and he says yes to a paycut? Well fans get your #12 Jerseys at a local sports shop!
 

ChicagoDawg1991

Guest
I do also understand he's been riddled with injuries but definitely a shot looking at considering all he has done for our team. Hes one of those guys that are hard to find in terms of defense and excellent 3 point shooting.
 

scottiepippen1994

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 8, 2010
Posts:
9,934
Liked Posts:
2,238
Location:
Chicago Illinois
Hell fucking Nooooooooo!!!!!!!
So your saying you want to go back to the good old days of battling for 8th spot.
No thank you.
I guess the Hinrich fan homerism will never end in Chicago :obama:

Hinrich isn't even a shell of what he used to be. And he wasn't much then.
C.J Watson is better than Hinrich.
Pax better be looking at Nash first.
 
Last edited:

Axl Rose

and I knew the silence of the world
Joined:
Oct 11, 2011
Posts:
12,246
Liked Posts:
4,405
ive come to accept kirk will be on this team next year

hes not really that good i mean he used to be an ok player but hes really fell off....even worse than BG

but it just seems like its gonna happen.....kirk will come super cheap and wont mind coming off the bench when rose comes back...something billups, miller, nash might not want to do
 

daddies3angels

Is it next year yet?
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
10,038
Liked Posts:
819
Location:
Peoria IL
Hell fucking Nooooooooo!!!!!!!
So your saying you want to go back to the good old days of battling for 8th spot.
No thank you.
I guess the Hinrich fan homerism will never end in Chicago :obama:

Hinrich isn't even a shell of what he used to be. And he wasn't much then.
C.J Watson is better than Hinrich.
Pax better be looking at Nash first.

:lmao:

Nash will not come to a team where he be riding the bench come January. He also cost way to much. Bulls have 4 guys making 10 mil +
 

ChicagoDawg1991

Guest
Still a better decision maker, 3 point shooter and defender than CJ. Thats why this an opinion right? I know you guys dont think highly of him but without him our franchise would have still been shit. Just saying
 

scottiepippen1994

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 8, 2010
Posts:
9,934
Liked Posts:
2,238
Location:
Chicago Illinois
ive come to accept kirk will be on this team next year

hes not really that good i mean he used to be an ok player but hes really fell off....even worse than BG

but it just seems like its gonna happen.....kirk will come super cheap and wont mind coming off the bench when rose comes back...something billups, miller, nash might not want to do

I don't think Nash or Miller would mind coming off the bench for Rose if it means they have a chance of winning a ring. They are both closer to 40 than 30 and either have a ring and are running out of time.
**** Hinrich, get it done Pax.

Sign Nash and trade for Gordon.
 

scottiepippen1994

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 8, 2010
Posts:
9,934
Liked Posts:
2,238
Location:
Chicago Illinois
Still a better decision maker, 3 point shooter and defender than CJ. Thats why this an opinion right? I know you guys dont think highly of him but without him our franchise would have still been shit. Just saying

That is totally false. The Bulls would of been just as good or better if we never had Hinrich.
What you should be saying is that without BEN GORDON the Bulls still would have been shit.
It was Ben that single handledly lead the Bulls back to respectability a hell of a lot more than Hinrich ever did.
 
Last edited:

Axl Rose

and I knew the silence of the world
Joined:
Oct 11, 2011
Posts:
12,246
Liked Posts:
4,405
I don't think Nash or Miller would mind coming off the bench for Rose if it means they have a chance of winning a ring. They are both closer to 40 than 30 and either have a ring and are running out of time.
**** Hinrich, get it done Pax.

Sign Nash and trade for Gordon.

i just dont see nash coming here....miller im not sure about

billups maybe....because we got RIP
 

ChicagoDawg1991

Guest
I dont see the Clippers letting Big Shot go unless they completely put their faith in Nick Young, Randy Foye and Mo Williams to carry that 2 Guard position
 

scottiepippen1994

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 8, 2010
Posts:
9,934
Liked Posts:
2,238
Location:
Chicago Illinois
i just dont see nash coming here....miller im not sure about

billups maybe....because we got RIP

LoL, I must admit it would be very interesting to see Rip and Billups reunited.
But then again, I'm worried about Billups injury issue and the Lord knows we don't need no more injury issues.
Billups at his age did suffer a very significant serious injury last year. He. Might not be near the same as he was.
But if he is, id be all for having Billups here. Ive always admired his high basketball IQ and he has a lot of class which would fit in well with the Bulls.
 
Last edited:

Crystallas

Three if by air
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
20,014
Liked Posts:
9,558
Location:
Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
"I'm baaaaaaaaaaaaaack" as Michael Jordan once said

I'm pretty sure Jordan didn't bah like a sheep, or say back like Heather O'Rourke from Poltergeist. From my personal collection.
imag0059u.jpg


But yeah, the sentiment is mutual. Kirk is on the list. He isn't #1, but I'll gladly settle for him(as one option, but not the end-all fix) if Gar actually pursues a good-sized list of better candidates.
 

Diddy1122

I ain't your pal dickface
Joined:
Mar 30, 2009
Posts:
4,459
Liked Posts:
1,155
Location:
Chicago
Please tell me I'm not the only person who remembers Capt. Kirk's clock-killing circle dribble, his ineffectiveness at guarding quicker guards, or his tendency to shrink in clutch situations? And this was back when Hinrich was actually a halfway decent player.

And enough with this "he a good 3-pt shooter" crap. He's shot over 40% from 3 just twice his entire career. He's above-average at best. But it appears the love affair with Hinrich will never end, as Scottie said. Guess I should just prepare for him to be back in a Bulls uni next year. Hell I see him all the time in Lincolnshire during the summer so it wouldn't be much of a change to see him all year round again. And if he does come back then I can stop worrying that Pargo will be our starting PG come November.
 

ChicagoDawg1991

Guest
I worked for a place called GazettesSports.com out here in Long Beach. I was a stats guy at the end of my senior year in high school then last January i became an intern writer for them and have been with em since
 

BNB

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Jun 9, 2011
Posts:
15,608
Liked Posts:
8,399
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  2. Oakland Raiders
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Please tell me I'm not the only person who remembers Capt. Kirk's clock-killing circle dribble, his ineffectiveness at guarding quicker guards, or his tendency to shrink in clutch situations? And this was back when Hinrich was actually a halfway decent player.

And enough with this "he a good 3-pt shooter" crap. He's shot over 40% from 3 just twice his entire career. He's above-average at best. But it appears the love affair with Hinrich will never end, as Scottie said. Guess I should just prepare for him to be back in a Bulls uni next year. Hell I see him all the time in Lincolnshire during the summer so it wouldn't be much of a change to see him all year round again. And if he does come back then I can stop worrying that Pargo will be our starting PG come November.

But you wanted Ben Gordon back? He did a lot of dribbling himself that resulted in a terrible shot in a lot of cases. Hinrich may not have been able to guard quicker guards as you say, but Gordon could guard anyone period. Also, he was very undersized for a SG. Sure, he was a good shooter... but so are a bunch of other guys in the NBA that bring more to the table.. and who are taller.

And Kirk is a good 3 point shooter. If Gordon is a great shooter at .406%, then Kirk isn't too far off at .378%. That's less than 3% off.. which isn't really a lot. Reggie Miller was a career .395% three-point shooter.

I'm not as high on Kirk as some are, but I'm not as low on him as others are either.

If we can, I'd rather go after another PG. But if we end up with Kirk at the end of the day, at least we'll know what we're getting and hope for the best.
 

Top