Why the false report? Any theories?

[RamiTheBullsFan]

My response to your posts were pretty simple. You said the meeting never happened. I said you, I, and everybody else didn't know. You were vague. Then you explained more clearly. Is there anything else to say? Idk

 

[FirstTimer]

My response to your posts were pretty simple.

Well that's obvious. You're seemingly incapable of complex thought.

You said the meeting never happened.

Correct. Because it didn't.

I said you, I, and everybody else didn't know.

Yes we do know. "The" meeting implies a specific meeting referenced by the OP, and other posters in this thread. Everyone knows what "the" meeting was. The one Broussard/Stein reported as taking place on Saturday in Miami. That one did not take place. There's no evidence to suggest/show it did.

You were vague.

Ok. Once again, it would be impossible for me to be "vague" as I referenced "The" meeting. In context of the OP's post about the Broussard/Stein report there was only one meeting mentioned, or having been reported as taking place. "The" meeting on Saturday night.

No other meeting was mentioned by Broussard, Stein, the OP, or any other poster in this thread before my response. There was only one meeting even been discussed and therefore only one meeting that even worked in the context of my original post in regards to the word "The".

Then you explained more clearly

The only reason further explanation was needed was because you were apparently dropped on your head repeatedly as a child....and perhaps even still to this day. That's the only possible way your complete lack of understanding of my post makes sense.

Is there anything else to say? Idk

Yep. You're still a moron.

 

[RamiTheBullsFan]

Lol right and can you back up your petty little insults? No.

Basically your message is clear: The word "it" isn't a vague word.

 

[FirstTimer]

Lol right and can you back up your petty little insults?

Your posts and articles back them up for me.

Thanks.

Basically your message is clear: The word "it" isn't a vague word.

You're STILL not getting it? My original post that you took issue with was over the word "The" which in the context of the thread was specific, and not vague, as there was only one meeting being discussed. By definition the word "The" could not have referenced any other meeting...because there was no other meeting to reference.

 

[RamiTheBullsFan]

Fine... "the" not "it." Whatever. Still vague. And I don't care what you think of my posts or my articles. All I do is try to help the site while all you do is get butt-hurt.

 

[FirstTimer]

Fine... "the" not "it." Whatever. Still vague.

Again. No it's not.

Learn to read:
My original post that you took issue with was over the word "The" which in the context of the thread was specific, and not vague, as there was only one meeting being discussed. By definition the word "The" could not have referenced any other meeting...because there was no other meeting to reference.

And I don't care what you think of my posts or my articles. All I do is try to help the site

Mission: Failed.

while all you do is get butt-hurt.

Yes, I'm butt hurt your a Special person. :shot: :slap:

 

[RamiTheBullsFan]

Lol again, a 6 short-word sentence is going to be vague- spin that all you want.

And again, your petty insults have no foundation.

 

[FirstTimer]

Lol again, a 6 short-word sentence is going to be vague- spin that all you want.

No, it's not. It's not vague because there was nothing else to reference. The word "The" made the entire sentence reference a specific meeting or "thing". "The meeting" specified what was being talked about. The rest was a description of said meeting. It was impossible for me to be referencing anything else with the word "The". I mean really? Did you pass high school english? How many words would have made the sentence "unvague"? 12? 8? 7?

"You're a Special person" 3 words. Really specific.

And again, your petty insults have no foundation.

Disagree. I've read your writings and postings.

That's rock solid foundation.

 

[RamiTheBullsFan]

I respectfully disagree with your definition of the word "vague" and "Special person." Good day to you sir

 

[FirstTimer]

I respectfully disagree with your definition of the word "vague" and "Special person."

Call the Merriam-Webster company then.

 

[RamiTheBullsFan]

Why do sucha thing when I already have you to tell me alladat

 

[FirstTimer]

Why do sucha thing when I already have you to tell me alladat

Because maybe Melissa has a connection there and can get you an interview?

Plus, logically, if you already have me to "tell you all that" then you can't really disagree with my definitions. As that's what you have me around for. To define words.

 

[RamiTheBullsFan]

So I see you've finally figured out that I don't take you seriously. You get a cookie.

Or do I... maybe you should come up with more responses!

 

[FirstTimer]

So I see you've finally figured out that I don't take you seriously. You get a cookie.

Or do I... maybe you should come up with more responses!

I don't control cookies here.


Talk to this guy: :cookiemonster:

 

[Glide2keva]

When do pitchers and catchers report?

Apparently, not soon enough

 

[Gustavus Adolphus]

I honestly would put my money on Bulls tickets. I just know they will leave with something great. Go get those tickets before its too late. The resale value will be worth it.

He told me they scrapped the 11 game plan, but at the time (2 or 3 weeks ago) it was still on their website.

He did say that when Thibby was the announced hire (before he was actually introduced as HC) 3,000 ticket requests came in.

 

[Gustavus Adolphus]

Yes I can.

Wade was in Chicago. I have first hand reports saying so.

Prove otherwise with first hand reporting and credible information.

As do I. He was in Chicago.

 

[Gustavus Adolphus]

Yes I do.

No meeting happened this past weekend.

Oh, I just knew about Wade. Can't speak to the others. Nevermind.