Would the Bears be better off with Sanquan instead of Swift

ndgt10

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 7, 2014
Posts:
931
Liked Posts:
574
Barkley has been an absolute beast running the ball but Poles thought Swift would be the better signing.

Think how good this O could be if Barkley was gashing D's as a Bear.
 

freddylamar

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 22, 2012
Posts:
832
Liked Posts:
1,093
Does the Eagles offensive line come with him??? I do think we’d be better with Barkley but we’d also been better with Mahomes, Donald, Moss, etc. To many what ifs throughout my years of being a fan to even care anymore.
 

RiDLer80

First time, long time.
Joined:
Feb 16, 2014
Posts:
4,219
Liked Posts:
3,921
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Miami Hurricanes
  2. Northern Illinois Huskies
I should be GM.

Had a couple people questioning a Barkley signing in my mock off-season but not only did Poles go after him, he pivoted to Swift showing that Poles did place a value on RB that others questioned.
 

RiDLer80

First time, long time.
Joined:
Feb 16, 2014
Posts:
4,219
Liked Posts:
3,921
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Miami Hurricanes
  2. Northern Illinois Huskies
Does the Eagles offensive line come with him??? I do think we’d be better with Barkley but we’d also been better with Mahomes, Donald, Moss, etc. To many what ifs throughout my years of being a fan to even care anymore.
We've seen Swift break runs. We've also see him miss holes and run into his blockers' backs.

Barkley is a better RB in every way: speed, quickness, elusiveness, vision. It's not even a question that we'd be better with Barkley than Swift.
 

DaaBears

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
11,894
Liked Posts:
11,640
Barkley definitely above Swift. The only issue Barkley has had over the years is injuries, one major one and some smaller. This is also his 7th year.

But Barkley seems stronger and healthier than ever, at least for now.
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,676
Liked Posts:
23,638
Yes Barkley is better but if you were him, where would you have chosen to play? Be happy he picked the Eagles or we might not even have Swift.

Yep, swift and barkley are not in the same league of player.

Also, the bears could have drastically overpaid for saquan(15m a year vs. 12 for the iggles) and he prob still chooses philly.

We really dont know what the bears offered, maybe it was the similar 12m and he knew 100% he had a better chance in Philly. Would be sad to know $$ was the main factor and poles was too cheap to dish out the extra 4m for Barkley vs. Gibbs
 

gallagher

Ave Atque Vale
Donator
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
8,075
Liked Posts:
7,167
Location:
Of Semi-Fixed Address
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Ohio Bobcats
Barkley is putting up a performance this year that will earn MVP votes. I would say that that is a strong yes, this team would be better off with him.
 

dabears70

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 31, 2013
Posts:
37,333
Liked Posts:
11,869
Location:
Orlando
My favorite teams
  1. New York Mets
  1. New York Knicks
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. New York Rangers
  1. Syracuse Orange
Barkley has been an absolute beast running the ball but Poles thought Swift would be the better signing.

Think how good this O could be if Barkley was gashing D's as a Bear.
Kinda dumb question because of course any team would be better with the better RB but Saquan wouldn't be Saquaning on this team with this OL either. He'd of course still be better than Swift, who's still a good 3 down RB, but would he be giving everything playing on this team like he is playing behind a top 3 OL in the NFL and dealing with everything else that comes with this team as well, and we'd be paying him over $13 mil as well.
 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,382
Liked Posts:
54,949
I member a lot of CCSers that mocked the notion of signing Saquon this past offseason…

I probably did because I generally am team don’t pay running backs. But he has been worth every dollar this year.
 

Gustavus Adolphus

?‍♂️?
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 15, 2010
Posts:
47,194
Liked Posts:
36,504
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Nebraska Cornhuskers
  2. Villanova Wildcats
Barkley has been an absolute beast running the ball but Poles thought Swift would be the better signing.

Think how good this O could be if Barkley was gashing D's as a Bear.
You're asking if the Bears would have been better off with the better of the two players?

Would the bears be better off with Mahomes instead of Caleb?
 

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
28,676
Liked Posts:
23,638
Would daniel be better off as a doctor vs. a failed blogger?

probably
 

playthrough2001

Monday Morning QB
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
15,307
Liked Posts:
17,860
Location:
United Club
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Central Florida Knights
  2. TCU Horned Frogs
Barkley has been an absolute beast running the ball but Poles thought Swift would be the better signing.

Think how good this O could be if Barkley was gashing D's as a Bear.
This isn’t true. Poles basically set the market for Barkley but Barkley wanted to go home.

 

BaBaBlacksheep

Moderator
Staff member
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
45,382
Liked Posts:
54,949
It was on hard knocks - The giants GM said the bears and eagles are the two main options.


My guess is the bears didnt want to offer saquan the guarantees he got on his deal(Think its like 27m?)

That or Saquon decided he could make similar money on a real team or a dumpster fire of a team 😂
 

Top