- Joined:
- Jun 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 7,127
- Liked Posts:
- 3,072
- Location:
- Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
If the price was right, sure, why not?
- Joined:
- May 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 11,225
- Liked Posts:
- 788
The WS don't have spects that would attract the Cubs in trading Z. But the Yanks would.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
sorry but the yanks, cubs and red sox hold the cards for a trade not the cubs. do you honestly think he is going to clean up on spects. please.
- Joined:
- May 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 11,225
- Liked Posts:
- 788
No but better than the shit you guys have. I would just keep him them, I love Z. He's still pretty young and is pitching well this year.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
cubs are 21st sox are 26th. but whatever.you overrate prospects sir. look what the royals got for greinke, a pitcher who is worth more than a carlos zambrano
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
A 4.40 ERA in the NL is pitching well?
- Joined:
- May 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 11,225
- Liked Posts:
- 788
1 bad game.... He's been pitching well.
- Joined:
- May 10, 2010
- Posts:
- 11,225
- Liked Posts:
- 788
you overrate prospects sir. look what the royals got for greinke, a pitcher who is worth more than a carlos zambrano
I don't... I just don't like the Sox farm system. I'd rather Keep Z than trade for spects that won't make the MLB. Even if that means keeping his contract.
- Joined:
- Jun 28, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,689
- Liked Posts:
- 754
No!!!!!