- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,953
- Liked Posts:
- 143
- Location:
- North Aurora,Illinois
The owner says he would trade him(saw this on espn). I think the Bulls should try and get him.Thoughts?
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
No.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 18,833
- Liked Posts:
- 7,449
- Location:
- Forest Park
My favorite teams
Depends on what we would give up
- Joined:
- Jun 28, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,689
- Liked Posts:
- 754
if we can give up Bogans, Johnson, and a draft pick for him, yes. Definitely.
He can score and shoot very well. He's not a great defender one on one. I watched him all the time he was at Davidson and I love him game. He would be a good fit for the Bulls.
He can score and shoot very well. He's not a great defender one on one. I watched him all the time he was at Davidson and I love him game. He would be a good fit for the Bulls.
Shakes
Iconoclast
- Joined:
- Apr 22, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,857
- Liked Posts:
- 142
As always it depends on what for. For the right deal then hell yes, he'd be awesome next to Rose.
In practice I think he'd be far too expensive for the Bulls to obtain though.
In practice I think he'd be far too expensive for the Bulls to obtain though.
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
Absolutely not. It would be beyond pointless to get Stephen Curry... the Bulls do not need a starting point guard.
sicko
New member
- Joined:
- Jun 3, 2010
- Posts:
- 807
- Liked Posts:
- 122
NO! Just because the Bulls don't need him
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,953
- Liked Posts:
- 143
- Location:
- North Aurora,Illinois
We could put him at SG,the position he played before he went to be a pg. If we can get a good deal going then I would do it,but if they wanted more than what they should get for him then no.
- Joined:
- Jun 28, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,689
- Liked Posts:
- 754
He is more than capable at the 2 spot. Did you see what he did at Davidson?
I would take him.
I would take him.
houheffna
Ignoring Idiots
- Joined:
- May 6, 2009
- Posts:
- 8,673
- Liked Posts:
- 2,711
Curry is a combo guard...he can play both guard positions. The size might be a problem. But he is a very good player when healthy.
- Joined:
- Jun 28, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,689
- Liked Posts:
- 754
More importantly than anything else, he can hit open shots. Him and Rose could interchange spots, they'd be a nightmare.
pinkizdead
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,692
- Liked Posts:
- 131
- Location:
- south loop
play rose at the 1, and have rose guard the bigger 2's. if the guards are too fast, put rose on him and have curry gaurd the slower guard. or just put rose on whoever the tougher matchup is. live with the efense, and kill them on offense. i'd give up everything and anything but noah, boozer, and rose.
thevarsityshow1
New member
- Joined:
- Jan 2, 2011
- Posts:
- 10
- Liked Posts:
- 1
- Location:
- Chicago
There is no way the Bulls would NEVER trade for Stephen Curry. Curry needs the ball in his hands and that would be a very small back court. Who would GSW even take back from the Bulls? Gar Pax should focus on O.J Mayo or the other Stephan, Stephan Jackson!
From D Co-Host of The Varsity Show Regal Radio | Internet Radio | Blog Talk Radio
From D Co-Host of The Varsity Show Regal Radio | Internet Radio | Blog Talk Radio
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,953
- Liked Posts:
- 143
- Location:
- North Aurora,Illinois
Supposedly the Grizzlies aren't trading Mayo anymore.
houheffna
Ignoring Idiots
- Joined:
- May 6, 2009
- Posts:
- 8,673
- Liked Posts:
- 2,711
Did you mean NEVER or EVER...that said, I like Mayo but he doesn't add much size to the table either. Curry is a better shooter than Mayo. I like both of their upsides. Jackson? I would rather have JR Smith than Jackson personally.
pinkizdead
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,692
- Liked Posts:
- 131
- Location:
- south loop
i'm warming up to the idea of jr smith. at the very least we can start brewer and let jr be our bench. jackson's getting up there in age. he's not a very efficient scorer, so i'm not sure what he's gonna do on the bulls. we dont have the shots for him boozer, rose, AND deng.
Venom
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 28, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,900
- Liked Posts:
- 128
He's undersized, but he's definetly a combo-guard that can shoot. That's a tough one though. The Warriors might ask for a bit too much
pinkizdead
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 30, 2009
- Posts:
- 3,692
- Liked Posts:
- 131
- Location:
- south loop
Naw we totally have the pieces to get this done. we could send over either lesser talent or overpaid talent. really low level draft picks (18-30) what more could they ask for?
houheffna
Ignoring Idiots
- Joined:
- May 6, 2009
- Posts:
- 8,673
- Liked Posts:
- 2,711
You don't know how good Curry is to say something like that...
- Joined:
- Jun 25, 2010
- Posts:
- 20,014
- Liked Posts:
- 9,558
- Location:
- Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
Curry will provide more offense for us, no doubt, and I'm not worried about his defense or size. I would however, be worried about his long term situation here. If he doesn't fit, we're screwed because of the players we need to give up, to get a guy like Curry. At least Mayo is such a fundamentalist player, that the risk wouldn't be too great. Not that I believe we can land either one of them through trade.
I do think we can land Afflalo, pending how Denver plans its possible rebuilding phase.It's another long shot, but he would fit into this team on day one.
And last but not least... I might have to find another gag-sig, because Bogans has put up a string of games, where he has improved a ton. He actually hit *gasp* a few contested 3 pointers, to go along with some respectable defense. ... I know, right. Not 1 decent game, but 3 in a row. At some minimum, if he can continue to mold into this scheme and make the small handful of shots that he does get, I think the Bulls can buy some time trying to land the right SG.
I do think we can land Afflalo, pending how Denver plans its possible rebuilding phase.It's another long shot, but he would fit into this team on day one.
And last but not least... I might have to find another gag-sig, because Bogans has put up a string of games, where he has improved a ton. He actually hit *gasp* a few contested 3 pointers, to go along with some respectable defense. ... I know, right. Not 1 decent game, but 3 in a row. At some minimum, if he can continue to mold into this scheme and make the small handful of shots that he does get, I think the Bulls can buy some time trying to land the right SG.
Staff online NOW
-
clonetrooper264Retired Bandwagon Mod