Aesopian
Hooters Waitress
- Joined:
- Jan 6, 2015
- Posts:
- 16,286
- Liked Posts:
- 8,213
- Location:
- Jupiter
My favorite teams
Past his prime but if he comes cheap he'd be a good number 3 receiver.
Emmanuel Sanders on a 3 year/33 million dollar deal > Landry on a 5yr/70 million dollar deal.
If that is what Emmanuel Sanders will cost pass on him I a was thinking 3 year/12 million.
$11M/ yr for a injured aging WR vs $14M/yr for a young rising already best at his position WR? Really?Emmanuel Sanders on a 3 year/33 million dollar deal > Landry on a 5yr/70 million dollar deal.
If that is what Emmanuel Sanders will cost pass on him I was thinking 3 year/12 million.
He'll be 31 in two months. I don't see Pace giving 11 mil a year to a guy that old. He has yet to hand out that kind of money to anyone over 30. We've typically seen 2yr/8mil type of deals for players like this from Pace.
You're saying the Bears suck because they haven't passed out big number contracts to players on the downside of their career?And this is why we suck. We need WR's big time and this dude has the hands to put up big numbers here. He had a down year last year as did that entire team. The previous 4 seasons prior to last year were pretty good for him.
$11M/ yr for a injured aging WR vs $14M/yr for a young rising already best at his position WR? Really?
E Sanders = a $33M better Eddie Royal or a $33M slightly better and older Kendall Wright. Signing players like him for stupid money is what 5-11 teams do.
What player could you add for the saved $3M cap that would make as much difference as the best slot WR in the NFL vs Sanders?
You're saying the Bears suck because they haven't passed out big number contracts to players on the downside of their career?
Emmanuel Sanders on a 3 year/33 million dollar deal > Landry on a 5yr/70 million dollar deal.
Emmanuel Sanders on a 3 year/33 million dollar deal > Landry on a 5yr/70 million dollar deal.