- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,259
- Liked Posts:
- 3,998
Established as a runner, 2nd foot down. does he have possession?????
Last edited by a moderator:
Dumpster Fire
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 17, 2014
- Posts:
- 609
- Liked Posts:
- 1,212
The ball started coming out so quickly, no way did he sufficiently establish himself as a runner before that ball was coming out. Garbage. I was so elated at the play and absolutely shocked when it was reversed.
Monsieur Tirets
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 8, 2012
- Posts:
- 8,682
- Liked Posts:
- 4,309
IMO it could have been called either way, but it was called a INT and thats the problem. they are supposed to have indisputable evidence before reversing a call, and yet each week they reverse calls on which there most certainly was not any indisputable evidence and they let plays stand for which there was absolutely indisputable evidence supporting a reversal.
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,259
- Liked Posts:
- 3,998
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,259
- Liked Posts:
- 3,998
L GUAPO
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,754
- Liked Posts:
- 1,442
- Location:
- Newport Beach, CA
This is a week after Devonte Freeman's TD was reversed as was Eifert's who took many more steps and had posession longer so it was an incompletion....like last week, except in our case it was an INT as ruled correctly on the field and backed by Mike Pereria.
Pathetic stuff right there
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 204
- Liked Posts:
- 57
Are you just trying to make yourself feel better about that call? Everyone and their dog, aside from the crew in Detroit and the controversial VP of officiating thought it should have been an INT based on the rules. Either way, it is water under the fucking bridge....we had a chance to win even with that play standing and the team fucked it up.... the end
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,259
- Liked Posts:
- 3,998
- Joined:
- Sep 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 41,927
- Liked Posts:
- 15,379
In my eyes, it's a catch but as officials have called these things consistently in the past, it's not.
Whatever, it's usually the receivers who get bamboozled on what's a catch, the process of a catch or not a catch. Chalk this 1 up for them.
Whatever, it's usually the receivers who get bamboozled on what's a catch, the process of a catch or not a catch. Chalk this 1 up for them.
FatBabiesHaveNoPride
Doors that go like this.
- Joined:
- Sep 11, 2013
- Posts:
- 6,504
- Liked Posts:
- 2,582
I'm not sure what the question is, but the answer is:
'Kyle Fuller sucks'
'Kyle Fuller sucks'
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 19,879
- Liked Posts:
- 11,082
- Location:
- Texas
Lol...contact was made and he was on his way down to the ground...he needs to complete the process of the catch to the ground....fn Dez Bryant was far more a runner then this and it was called off because he didnt complete process of catch.
He can say he wasnt going down, but he was being tackled by a defender prior to two feet hitting ground
Scoot34
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 22, 2010
- Posts:
- 86
- Liked Posts:
- 7
- Location:
- Ocean City MD
Looked to me like the ball had started to come loose before his 2nd foot came down.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
3rd N Long
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 20, 2014
- Posts:
- 1,592
- Liked Posts:
- 847
Established as a runner, 2nd foot down. does he have possession?????
I call heads
Scoot34
New member
- Joined:
- Aug 22, 2010
- Posts:
- 86
- Liked Posts:
- 7
- Location:
- Ocean City MD
Also, I know I'm biased but, how could the ref say he wasn't going to the ground when he did actually go to the ground.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
3rd N Long
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 20, 2014
- Posts:
- 1,592
- Liked Posts:
- 847
Good luck to anyone trying to top this answer.
- Joined:
- May 18, 2014
- Posts:
- 10,207
- Liked Posts:
- 12,340
- Location:
- murica
Looks like a bust to me.
3rd N Long
New member
- Joined:
- Nov 20, 2014
- Posts:
- 1,592
- Liked Posts:
- 847
That's because he only went to the ground because he fumbled it....oh wait.....
rextc
Active member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 299
- Liked Posts:
- 229
- Location:
- McDonough County
Golden Tate must have incriminating photos of all officials. He is handed more calls gift wrapped than a rich kid at Christmas.
Sent from my SM-G530R4 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G530R4 using Tapatalk
- Joined:
- Oct 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,976
- Liked Posts:
- 6,451
- Location:
- Greenville, NC
Everyone should change their name to Scoot##
PAPABEAR77
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 3,575
- Liked Posts:
- 1,007
- Location:
- texas
he is not a runner he is a receiver catching the ball it should be complete the catch all the way just because you have to feet down and it in your hand doesn't mean you have full possession until the act of the catch is finished.
http://www.chicitysports.com/forum/showthread.php/72223-The-Refs-Are-Cheating-Us/page4
hear is a example of one that was call a interception
http://www.chicitysports.com/forum/showthread.php/72223-The-Refs-Are-Cheating-Us/page4
hear is a example of one that was call a interception
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up