I agree with you, Lefty, to a certain extent. It's easy to
say "I'm not gonna let his ruin my day." It's a much harder thing to
live it. Passions and emotions run high during a football game for players and fans alike. We cheer loudly and sometimes boo, and treat the game like it's the most important thing in the world. What makes it so entertaining is that we are so
emotionally involved. But, Like a good movie, when it's over, it's over. (I'm speaking just for myself, here.) But I don't think it is profitable or healthy to to get upset about how a bunch of athletes performed during a sporting event.
I just knew something resembling this post would pop up eventually. This is a tired argument that is usually reserved for use by people that don't want to face (or are incapable of facing) the realities surrounding their respective chosen sports teams.
I am very capable of facing the realities of the Bears, Bulls and my other "favorite" teams. I love to read about, discuss, analyze statistics, make predictions, etc. It's fun, but I don't let it get me too up or down. I guess I'm just not a very "emotional" person, but I am "passionate" about things that are important to me.
You can't tell people to quell their happiness or depression based on the play of a sports team because it's "just a game" and it "doesn't have an affect on your life", because there is no logical conclusion for that mantra.
True, emotional reactions pretty much defy logic. But I think we can (at least, I think
I can) choose to decide what things warrant getting emotional about - relationships, work, faith. In the grand scheme of things, sports are not that important, and I thing some people "over react."
Where is the line drawn between "you can let this influence your emotional state" and "you cannot let this influence your emotional state"? What level of direct effect on one's life is necessary to move something from the "can't care" side to the "can care" side?
That's for each person to decide for themselves.
What's more, who makes that decision? You? Is there some gold-standard by which we should all set our emotional clocks for optimum happiness?
I make that decision
for myself. I wasn't making a "right-or-wrong" judgment of anyone. I was just offering my opinion that you can watch and enjoy the game without getting all suicidal about it when your team doesn't do well.
When dealing with how individual sentient beings react to and perceive input (emotions), the line between two supposed definite areas (like "caring" and "not caring" about the play of a sports franchise) isn't a line anymore, it is a big fuzzy cloud, because those beings are supposedly free to interpret said input in any way they choose, and the emotional impact on those beings is based at least in part on how those beings perceive and weight specific events. ...
I agree 100% here and with your calculus analogy that followed. I think some people tend to lose perspective that it
is a choice.
... it is improper to use a "right vs. wrong" or "can vs. cannot" rule when approaching how an individual (or many of them) interact with and perceive the world.
I didn't mean to be that black and white about it. I was just making an observation that, in my
opinion (not being dogmatic), getting pissed off at football players, or refusing to watch them because they are struggling, is a bit of an over reaction.
If one gets that emotional, and no longer enjoys the game, by all means, don't watch it. It is supposed to be entertainment, after all. I'm not going to let a crappy offensive line and boneheaded receivers stop me from watching a sport I love. If nothing else I can enjoy watching the athletic performances of Bears opponents.