- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 58,139
- Liked Posts:
- 38,158
Already went over this moments ago. Post #229 if you are scoring at home.
In coachspeak blather, when I hear "they just out-executed us", I interpret that to mean the teams were relatively equal, but one team made mistakes and the other team didn't. No one would 'surmise' that one team was clearly superior to the other, or had large advantages in certain areas. Not sure why you expect people to interpret your comments to mean the opposite of reality (although, admittedly, this would probably make sense on some level).
It is disingenuous of you to spend entire paragraphs pointing out the similarities between Dilfer and Brady, and then now say "where did I say this?". Let's recap what you said...
Here, you are allowing that Dilfer is comparable to Wilson and Brady. This is obvious, and borne out by the remainder of your statement. You have created a derogatory "Game Manager Scale", and you indicated that Wilson and Brady are definitely on it.
Again, you continue with the Dilfer is comparable to Wilson and Brady discussion. You indicate that you've given this idea much thought, and determined that Dilfer is indeed comparable to those two HOF QBs because Wilson/Brady's teams played like the 2000 Ravens (I can't even comment on such nonsense, as that would lead to another 15+ page thread). You also imply that any team which plays great D and limits mistakes (sounds like an ESPN Sunday Morning 'game breakdown' because it is so utterly inane) must be quarterbacked by a "Game Manager", which makes no sense.
We finally get to the 'money shot'. I've already discussed this section of your statement many times, to which you have yet to respond, so I am not sure what else I can add at this point. You are saying that Dilfer has the same 'tools' as Wilson and Brady...he is as mobile as Wilson, as accurate as Brady, can equal both in terms of 'pure passing'...but what separates Wilson and Brady from Dilfer is that Wilson and Brady simply carried out their coach's gameplan better in terms of execution...in other words, to demonstrate the heights of your lunacy, they were BETTER GAME MANAGERS THAN TRENT DILFER!
Again, perhaps the dumbest football thought ever posited on CCS. And that covers a lot of territory.
Congratulations are in order.
1. What you heard and what I actually said are two different things. If you use the term execute in that manner than when you use the term you are free to tell me what you meant by using the term. However, I used the term so what I meant by it governs not your interpretation of it.
2. Please cite where I spent paragraphs pointing out similarities. I don't want your interpretation of my words but the actual words I used. I said one group was on the low end of the game manager spectrum while the others obviously are on the high end. This would be like arguing I said Jamarcus Russell and Tom Brady were similar because I said Russell is on the low end of the QB scale and Brady is on the high end. That is not saying they are similar at all. Again your confusion seems to stem from you not understanding one can be a good game manager and one can be a great one. I gave you a scale and never claimed they were similar.
3. Please cite where I said Dilfer has the same tools as Wilson and Brady. Again, I don't want your interpretation of my words but the actual words I used. No where did I speak about their tools because that was not the focal point of the statement. I was referring to their ability to manage the game since we were talking about game managers. So I had no reason to be thinking about their respective tools when the point was one group executed their game manager duties much better than the other group. Not sure how you could take that statement and surmise I am talking about things that have nothing to do with the subject.
In closing, you seem to be under the mistaken impression that just because you decide to interpret my words in a stupid manner that your interpretation becomes the truth. I wrote the words. I am telling you that your interpretation of them is stupid and bears no resemblance to what I meant. If you would like to know what I meant when I said something then just ask as you continually get it wrong anytime you try to interpret, infer, imply or use any sort of critical thinking skills.
Last edited: