- Joined:
- Oct 19, 2013
- Posts:
- 7,956
- Liked Posts:
- 829
- Location:
- Wish You Were Here
LOL @ being outraged of spending that is smaller than a drop in the bucket. Cutting these is sure to fix all of the US debt problems. Please.
All of those are COMPLETELY NECESSARY expenses.
If we just raise taxes just a little more....
LOL @ being outraged of spending that is smaller than a drop in the bucket. Cutting these is sure to fix all of the US debt problems. Please.
I am sure you were being sarcastic here and think it is not a big deal.
Well, spending a trillion and a half ($1,500,000,000,000) more then what you bring in every year is a F'n problem.
Unelect all of these MF's.
LOL @ being outraged of spending that is smaller than a drop in the bucket. Cutting these is sure to fix all of the US debt problems. Please.
By unelect do you mean hang them from the gallows or roast them over a fire? I'm just not quite sure
That'll do.
I hope not a single one of you right leaning folks ***** about this being a left "spending us to death" thing.
There is not one single mention of who asked for and who voted on these appropriations. There is also no mention of what bills they were added to (pork barrel and earmark method).
Our congress sucks, not by design, but by what they have ALL turned it into with their self serving ways. It certainly didn't start with the current congress and it won't stop any time soon.
You are completely missing the point. When you are adding to the debt every day, and cant seem to find anywhere to cut spending, when expenditures like this exist its a matter of principle, it doesnt matter if cutting them will save the budget, but it sure doesnt hurt. thats 6.5 billion dollars they didnt have before. It doesnt matter wasted spending is wasted spending we dont have money, theres no justification for it.
Fucking Liberals and their video game perservation
You are completely missing the point. When you are adding to the debt every day, and cant seem to find anywhere to cut spending, when expenditures like this exist its a matter of principle, it doesnt matter if cutting them will save the budget, but it sure doesnt hurt. thats 6.5 billion dollars they didnt have before. It doesnt matter wasted spending is wasted spending we dont have money, theres no justification for it.
Your 'math' logic is sound, but who is to say all of that stuff is "wasted spending"? Maybe it was very useful and important to the people who will benefit from those expenditures. I just scanned through the whole list and there is a lot of bullshit on there, but quite a bit is trumped up to sound devious and bad. This was from Coburn's office after all. How much of "our" money did HE spend to do this little report?