PatrickShart
New member
- Joined:
- May 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 4,782
- Liked Posts:
- 452
Just need a little spit on it...
I don't know if he was trying to force things or just out of gas becuase the he couldn't keep the puck on his stick and had some wild passes... plus the empty net he missed because his stick wasn't down made me sad... still would have been a tough play and not a natural position to have his stick in at the time... but would have been great.I think once Kanes gets more help on his line...he'll start getting more room again
Sharp is notoriously streaky....and hasn't put a puck in the net in awhile...and Bolland...well...
Yeah, went through someone else before it went through Fasth's legs, he probably didn't even see it till it was past him which is why he didn't have his stick down he raised it to skate behind the net it looked like. If it would have been down it might have hit it though you never know.I had the ANA feed all game...I think I saw that play...the puck went thru Fasth's legs?
Those guys were calling Shaw - Andy Shaw....and calling Frolik Shaw all game...otherwise, not too bad
They scored a PP goal on their 2nd opportunity Wolf. They could have had 5-6 more. Not sure what Dvorsky and Vansshole were watching.
Bickell has been a beast...he's still young (26..soon to be 27)
It's going to be interesting to see what he/Stalberg get..and if Scooter boy can keep them at a decent price.
Also...I've been hearing a lot about how the locker room was a ghost town after the game...the players were quite pissed. Q seems to have a pretty motivated group...very good to hear they're not resting on the start, buying the hype of the record - to what their goal is.
You can keep defending the PP all you want, Ron, but the proof is staring us all in the face. It was good at the start of this season, but it's been trailing off since then. We're now 16th in the league, I believe, and we've been falling since the early part of this season. Yes, we "could" have had more PP goals, but the fact is we did not. Our PP stinks right now; Q can preach all about how there's "good movement" and it doesn't hurt the team's "momentum" during the course of the game. But, when push comes to shove, we should be scoring more. It flat out cost us a point last night, and points are important...
They're not going to score every PP. They've had PP's where they haven't scored, but had good pressure and gained momentum. I can name 5 official "PP's" off the top of my head, that were less than 1min in length...or the ones in PHX where they ran out regular lines/not to run up a score. That all hurts the every mighty percentage. CAL, WASH, NYI are all near the top percentage of the PP..but shitbag teams.
Yes, they squandered the chance in the OT. But they took what was given - and there wasn't much. Guys aren't going to start running around the zone like a chinese firedrill, simply to show movement. ANA wasn't going to let them pass through the triangle last night on that 4 on 3. There were zero lanes. So all a PP can do in that situation is work...either low to high or point to point. Kane was roatating high/low as well...but the lanes weren't there (credit to ANA)...and if/when a shot got through - Toews was there - but Fasth controlled any rebound.
They're finally home - meaning that they can practice an not travel. I'm sure it's something that they can work more on. But they're not going to score on every single one. 21-23% is where a team is near tops in the league at the end of full seasons. They're not far off of that.
They're finally home - meaning that they can practice an not travel. I'm sure it's something that they can work more on. But they're not going to score on every single one. 21-23% is where a team is near tops in the league at the end of full seasons. They're not far off of that.